ABSTRACT
Augmented reality technology adapted for air traffic control tower applications was used to track an OH-58C helicopter in proximity to an airport. A camera and 'see-through' display system was used to measure the registration error of static airport features and dynamic test aircraft. The observed registration errors of the test aircraft were largely attributable to two terms of error: 1) aircraft surveillance transport latency, and 2) registration error (from all sources) of the static environment. Compensating for registration errors of static objects and modeling aircraft movement reduces registration errors for dynamic (aircraft) objects to ≤2° of error for aircraft-surveillance transport latency ≤ 5 seconds, and to ≤1° of error for transport latency ≤ 2 seconds.
- Arthur III, J. T. J., Prinzel III, L. J., Shelton, K. J., Kramer, L. J., Williams, S. P., Bailey, R. E., & Norman, R. M., Synthetic Vision Enhanced Surface Operations With Head-Worn Display for Commercial Aircraft. The International Journal Of Aviation Psychology, 19, 2, (2009), 158--181. Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20090017752.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Azuma, R., and Bishop, G. Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD. Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, (1994), 197--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azuma, R., Daily, M., and Krozel, J., Advanced Human-Computer Interfaces for Air Traffic Management and Simulation, Proceedings of 1996 AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, Washington, DC, (1996), 656--666.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bajura, M., and Neumann, U. Dynamic registration correction in video-based augmented reality systems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15, 5, (1995), 52--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellis, S.R., and Liston, D.B., "Static and motion-based visual features used by airport tower controllers," NASA TM-2011-216427, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, (2011).Google Scholar
- Ellis, S.R., Furstenau, N., and Mittendorf, M., Frame Rate Effects on Visual Discrimination of Landing Aircraft Deceleration: Implications for Virtual Tower Design and Speed Perception, Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, (September, 2011), 71--75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellis, S.R., McGreevy, M.W., and Hitchcock, R.J., Perspective traffic display format and airline pilot traffic avoidance, Human Factors, 29, HFES, Santa Monica, CA, (1987), 371--382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellis, S.R., Schmidt-Ott, J. R., Krozel, J., Reisman, R.J., and Gips, J., Augmented reality in a simulated tower environment: effect of field of view on aircraft detection, NASA TM 2002-211853, (2002). Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030005687.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Ellis, S.R., Towards determination of visual requirements for augmented reality displays and virtual environments for the airport tower. Proceedings of the NATO workshop on Virtual Media for the Military, West Point, N.Y. HFM-121/RTG 042 HFM-136, (2006), 24-1-24-9. Available at http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a473306.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Feiner, S. Augmented reality: A new way of seeing. Scientific American, 286, 4, (April 2002), 34--41. Available at http://203.68.243.199/saweb/pdf.file/en/e004/e004p036.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Foyle, D.C., Andre, A.D., McCann, R.S., Wenzel, E., Begault, D., and Battiste, V., Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System: Problem, design philosophy and description of an integrated display suite for low-visibility airport surface operations, SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, No. 105, SAE, Warrendale, PA, (1996), 1411--1418.Google Scholar
- Fürstenau, N., Schmidt, M., Rudolph, M., Möhlenbrink, C., & Halle, W., Augmented vision videopanorama system for remote airport tower operation., Proc. ICAS. (September, 2008). Available at http://www.icas-proceedings.net/ICAS2008/PAPERS/093.PDFGoogle Scholar
- Kramer, L. J., Arthur III, J. J., Bailey, R. E., & Prinzel III, L. J., Flight testing an integrated synthetic vision system. In Defense and Security, International Society for Optics and Photonics, (May, 2005), 1--12. Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050160185.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Kramer, L. J., Bailey, R. E., Ellis, K. K., Norman, R. M., Williams, S. P., Arthur III, J. J., Shelton, K.J., Prinzel III, L. J., Enhanced and synthetic vision for terminal maneuvering area nextgen operations. SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, International Society for Optics and Photonics, (June, 2011), 80420T-80420T. Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110011181.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Krozel. J., Birtcil, L., Mueller, K.T., and Azuma, R., Augmented reality system for the ATC Tower, NASA TR 98183-01, 1999.Google Scholar
- Mackay, W. E., Fayard, A. L., Frobert, L., & Médini, L., Reinventing the familiar: exploring an augmented reality design space for air traffic control. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., (1998), 558--565. Available at http://stl.cs.queensu.ca/~graham/cisc836/lectures/readings/chi98-mackay.pdf Google ScholarDigital Library
- Redeiss, H.A., "An augmented reality pilot display for airport operations under low and zero visibility conditions," AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, A97-37001 10-63, Vol. 2, AIAA, Washington, DC, (1997), pp. 912--929.Google Scholar
- Reisman, R J., and Ellis, S.R., Augmented reality for air traffic control, SIGGRAPH 2003 Sketches & Applications: In conjunction with the 30th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, (2003). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reisman, R. J., & Brown, D. M., Design of augmented reality tools for air traffic control towers. In 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Wichita, KS, (2006).Available at http://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/publications/more/other/reisman_09_06.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Reisman, R. J., & Ellis, S. R., Air traffic control tower augmented reality field study. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Posters, ACM, (2005), 52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reisman, R.J., and Brown, D.M., Augmented Reality Tower Technology Assessment, NASA TM--2010-216011, (2010). Available at http://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/publications/2010/Reisman_TM-2010-216011_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Ruffner, J.W., and Fulbrook, J.E., Usability Considerations for a Tower Controller Near-Eye Augmented Reality Display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 51, 2, (2007), 117--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Augmented reality tower technology flight test
Recommendations
Research of Flight Test Method for Manned/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cooperation Technology
ICRSA 2022: 2022 the 5th International Conference on Robot Systems and Applications (ICRSA)With the changes in combat philosophy and environment, the use of UAVs to assist manned aircraft in carrying out more complex combat missions has become a significant point of research for military powers worldwide. Through long-term theoretical ...
Research on Test Aircraft Quantitative Analysis Model during Flight Test Planning
ISCSIC 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent ControlThe process of civil aircraft development is a complex system, where flight test is an extremely important process of the project. In the top-level planning of flight test, it is particularly important to determine the quantity of test aircraft, which ...
Study of NASA-TLX and Eye Blink Rates Both in Flight Simulator and Flight Test
Engineering Psychology and Cognitive ErgonomicsAbstractIn order to determine the minimum flight crew number and to show compliance with aircraft airworthiness regulations of CS25.1523, the workload of flight crew should be measured in various fight scenarios both in flight simulator and in flight ...
Comments