skip to main content
10.1145/2662155.2662194acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participants' view on personal gains and PD process

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

While it is commonly claimed that users of participatory design projects reap benefits from their participation, little research exists that shows if this truly occurs in the real world. In this paper, we introduce the method and results of assessing the participants' perception of their personal benefits and the degree of participation in a large project in the healthcare field. Our research shows that a well-executed participatory design project can produce most of the benefits hypothesized in the literature but also highlights the challenges of assessing individual benefits and the PD process.

References

  1. Bannon, L. (2009). Constructing utopia(s) in situ - Daring to be different. In T. Binder, J. Löwgren & L. Malmborg (Eds.), (Re)Searching The Digital Bauhaus (pp. 61--77). London, UK: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., & Simonsen, J. (2004). Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Realities (pp. 58--65). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bossen, C., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2010). User gains and PD aims: Assessmment from a participatory design project. Paper presented at the PDC, Sidney, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bossen, C., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2012). Impediments to User Gains: Experiences from a Critical Participatory Design Project. Paper presented at the PDC 2012, Roskilde, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brandt, E., Messeter, J., & Binder, T. (2008). Formatting design dialogues - games and participation. CoDesign, 4(1), 51--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Garde, J. A. and M. C. van der Voort (2012). Co-designing better work organization in healthcare. Advances in Human Aspects of Healthcare, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Garde, J. A. and M. C. van der Voort (2013). The Activity-Flow Co-Design Game: Designing for scheduled and unscheduled use situations. Paper presented at IASDR. Tokyo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gough, H. G. (1996). CPI Manual: Third Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan Personality Inventory Manual: Second Edition. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Robertson, T., & Wagner, I. (2013). Ethics; Engagement, representation and politics-in-action. In T. Robertson & J. Simonsen (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (pp. 64--85). New York, USA: Routledge International Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Segalowitz, M. (2012). "Participation" in Participatory Design Research. Master, Queensland University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith, M. J., & Carayon-Saintfort, P. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. Industrial Ergonomics, Industrial Ergonomics, 67--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tudor, L. G., Muller, M. J., Dayton, T., & Root, R. W. (1993). participatory design technique for high-level task analysis, critique, and redesign: The CARD method. Paper presented at the HFES, Seattle WA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Urnes, T., Weltzien, Å., Zanussi, A., Engbakk, S., & Rafn, J. K. (2002). Pivots and structured play: Stimulating creative user input in concept development. Paper presented at the NordiCHI, Århus, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Participants' view on personal gains and PD process

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2
        October 2014
        278 pages
        ISBN:9781450332149
        DOI:10.1145/2662155

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader