skip to main content
10.1145/2662155.2662178acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing collaborative rule-making on global sustainability concerns through participatory design: a research agenda based empirically on United Nations developments on business conduct

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This short paper outlines the background and prospects for a potential research agenda of Participatory Design (PD) in the area of collaborative transnational rule-making on global sustainability concerns. The paper adopts a pragmatic approach to interdisciplinary work, identifying new opportunities for PD by pointing to social science oriented processes that may be strengthened by the theory and practice of PD. With a theoretical foundation in legal philosophy on legitimacy and steps towards a deliberative democratic evolution of norms of conduct for global concerns, the paper is concerned with opportunities to involve a global citizenry in the evolution of norms of conduct that may affect the lives and futures of individuals. The paper describes research potential for PD towards enhancing information technology assisted inclusion of views, needs and concerns of individuals in transnational rule-making. It does so by drawing on the process that led to the 2011 United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This process exemplifies challenges in collaborative and inclusive global rule-making that that may be assisted by increased and informed deployment of IT in order to enhance broad and balanced participation in the rule-making process.

References

  1. Aker, Jenny C. and Isaac M. Mbiti (2010) Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa, Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 211, Tufts University - The Fletcher School of Law and DiplomacyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Auld, G., Bernstein, S. and Cashore, B. (2008). The new Corporate Social Responsibility. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 33(1), 413--435Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Buhmann (2012) Business and Human Rights: Analysing Discursive Articulation of Stakeholder Interests to Explain the Consensus-based Construction of the 'Protect, Respect, Remedy UN Framework'. International Law Research, Vol. 1, Issue 1: 88--101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Buhmann, K (2014) Normative discourses and public-private regulatory strategies for construction of CSR normativity: Towards a method for above-national public-private regulation of business social responsibilities. Copenhagen: Multivers publishingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Backer, Larry Cata (2006) Multinational Corporations, transnational law: The United Nations' Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as a harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibilty in international law, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 37, Winter 2006: 287--389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Braa, Jørgen & Sundeep Sahay (2013) Health Information Systems Programme: Participatory Design within the HISP Network, in Simonsen, Jesper and Toni Robertson (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design, New York: Routledge: 235--256Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bratteteig, Tone, Keld Bødker, Yvonne Dittrich, Preben Holst Mogensen & Jesper Simonsen (2013) Methods: Organising principles and general guidelines for Participatory Design projects, in in Simonsen, Jesper and Toni Robertson (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design, New York: Routledge: 117--144Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, Archie B. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct, Business & Society Review, Vol. 39, No. 3: 264--295Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. De Schutter, Olivier (2013), 'Preface', in Deva, Surya and David Bilchitz (eds) Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Deva, Surya (2013), 'Treating Human Rights Lightly: A Critique of the Consensus Rhetoric and the Language Employed by the Guiding Principles', in Deva, Surya and David Bilchitz (eds) Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, translated by William Rehg, Cambridge: Polity Press/BlackwellGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas, Jürgen (1998) Jenseits der Nationalstaats: Bemerkungen zu Folgeprobleme der wirtschaftlichen Globalisierung, in Beck, Ulrich (ed.) Politik der Globalisierung, Frankfurt am Main.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Habermas, Jürgen (2004) Folkeretten i overgangen til den postnationale konstellation, Distinktion No. 8: 9--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Habermas, Jürgen (2007) A political constitution for the pluralist world society? Journal of Chinese Philosphy: 331--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hughes, Nick and Susie Lonie (2007) M-PESA: Mobile Money for the "Unbanked" Turning Cellphones into 24-Hour Tellers in Kenya, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization Vol. 2 No. 1-2: 63--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kinley, David, Justine Nolan and Natalie Zerial (2007) The politics of corporate social responsibility: Reflections on the United Nations Human Rights Norms for Corporations, Company and Securities Law Journal: 30--42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Knox, John H., 'The Ruggie Rules: Applying human rights law to corporations', in Mares, Radu (ed) The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Antwerp: Brill, 2012) 51--83Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Koh, Harold, 'Why do nations obey international law? (Review essay)' (1997) 106(8) The Yale Law Journal 2599--2659Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambooy, Tineke, Aikaterina Argyrou and Mary Varner (2013) An analysis and practical application of the Guiding Principles on providing remedies with special reference to case studies related to oil companies, in Deva, Surya and David Bilchitz (eds) Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 329--377Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The link between competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review: 78--92Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, January/February 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl (2009): Responsibility, Ethics and Legitimacy of Corporations, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Robertson, Toni and Jesper Simonsen (2013) Participatory Design: An introduction, in Simonsen, Jesper and Toni Robertson (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design, New York: Routledge 1--18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tamanaha, Brian Z., Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a social theory of law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tuodolo, Felix (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility: Between Civil Society and the Oil Industry in the developing world, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographics 8(3):530--541Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. UN (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. UN (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations 'Protect, Respect, Remedy' Framework, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zumbansen, Peer, (2012) Transnational law, Evolving, in Smits, Jan (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar: 898--925Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing collaborative rule-making on global sustainability concerns through participatory design: a research agenda based empirically on United Nations developments on business conduct

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2
          October 2014
          278 pages
          ISBN:9781450332149
          DOI:10.1145/2662155

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader