skip to main content
10.1145/2591971.2591979acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Network-design sensitivity analysis

Published:16 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traffic matrices are used in many network engineering tasks, for instance optimal network design. Unfortunately, measurements of these matrices are error-prone, a problem that is exacerbated when they are extrapolated to provide the predictions used in planning. Practical network design and management should consider sensitivity to such errors, but although robust optimisation techniques exist, it seems they are rarely used, at least in part because of the difficulty in generating an ensemble of admissible traffic matrices with a controllable error level. We address this problem in our paper by presenting a fast and flexible technique of generating synthetic traffic matrices. We demonstrate the utility of the method by presenting a methodology for robust network design based on adaptation of the mean-risk analysis concept from finance.

References

  1. D. Applegate and E. Cohen. Making intra-domain routing robust to changing and uncertain traffic demands: Understanding fundamental tradeoffs. In ACM SIGCOMM, pages 313--324, August 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. S. Cahn. Wide Area Network Design. Morgan Kaufman, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. E. Deming and F. F. Stephan. On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Ann. Math. Stat, 11(4):427--444, 1940.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B. Eriksson, R. Durairajan, and P. Barford. RiskRoute: A framework for mitigating network outage threats. In CoNEXT '13, pages 405--416, December 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. Erramilli, M. Crovella, and N. Taft. An independent-connection model for traffic matrices. In ACM IMC 2006, pages 251--256, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Feldmann, A. Greenberg, C. Lund, N. Reingold, J. Rexford, and F. True. Deriving demands for operational IP networks: Methodology and experience. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 9:265--280, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. E. Fienberg. An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables. Ann. Math. Stat., 41(3):907--917, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. Fortz and M. Thorup. Optimizing OSPF/IS--IS weights in a changing world. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, 20(4):756--767, May 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In NIPS, pages 556--562, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Liang, B. Yu, and N. Taft. A fast lightweight approach to origin-destination IP traffic estimation using partial measurements. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 14:2634--2648, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. Markowitz. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1):77--91, March 1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Medina, N. Taft, K. Salmatian, S. Bhattacharyya, and C. Diot. Traffic matrix estimation: Existing techniques and new directions. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Mitra and Q. Wang. Stochastic traffic engineering for demand uncertainty and risk-aware network revenue management. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 13(2):221--233, April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. NLANR. Abilene Trace Data. http://pma.nlanr.net/Special/ipls3.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. I. Norros. On the use of fractional Brownian motion in the theory of connectionless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(6):953--961, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Nucci, A. Sridharan, and N. Taft. The problem of synthetically generating IP traffic matrices: Initial recommendations. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 35:19--32, July 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Roughan. Simplifying the synthesis of Internet traffic matrices. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 35(5):93--96, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Roughan. Robust network planning. In C. R. Kalmanek, S. Misra, and R. Yang, editors, The Guide to Reliable Internet Services and Applications, chapter 5, pages 137--177. Springer, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Roughan and J. Gottlieb. Large-scale measurement and modeling of backbone Internet traffic. In SPIE ITCom, Boston, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Roughan, A. Greenberg, C. Kalmanek, M. Rumsewicz, J. Yates, and Y. Zhang. Experience in measuring backbone traffic variability: Models, metrics, measurements and meaning. In ACM IMW, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Roughan, M. Thorup, and Y. Zhang. Traffic engineering with estimated traffic matrices. In ACM IMC 2003, pages 248--258, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. Sinkhorn and P. Knopp. Concerning nonnegative matrices and doubly stochastic matrices. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 21(2), 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. A. Soule, A. Nucci, R. Cruz, E. Leonardi, and N. Taft. How to identify and estimate the largest traffic matrix elements in a dynamic environment. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 32(1):73--84, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Teixera, N. Duffield, J. Rexford, and M. Roughan. Traffic matrix reloaded: Impact of routing changes. In Workshop on Passive and Active Measurements, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Tune and M. Roughan. Internet traffic matrices: A primer. In H. Haddadi and O. Bonaventure, editors, Recent Advances in Networking, Vol. 1. ACM SIGCOMM, August 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. P. Tune and M. Roughan. Network-design sensitivity analysis. Technical report, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, January 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Y. Vardi. Network Tomography: Estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 91:365--377, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Y. Zhang, M. Roughan, N. Duffield, and A. Greenberg. Fast accurate computation of large-scale IP traffic matrices from link loads. In ACM SIGMETRICS 2003, pages 206--217, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Zhang, M. Roughan, C. Lund, and D. Donoho. Estimating Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint traffic matrices: An information-theoretic approach. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 13(5):947--960, October 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. R. Zhang-Shen and M. McKeown. Designing a predictable Internet backbone with Valiant load-balancing. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Quality of Service (IWQoS), pages 178--192, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Network-design sensitivity analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMETRICS '14: The 2014 ACM international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
        June 2014
        614 pages
        ISBN:9781450327893
        DOI:10.1145/2591971

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 June 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGMETRICS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate40of237submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader