skip to main content
research-article

Accurate and Efficient Algorithms that Adapt to Privacy-Enhanced Video for Improved Assistive Monitoring

Published:01 October 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Automated monitoring algorithms operating on live video streamed from a home can effectively aid in several assistive monitoring goals, such as detecting falls or estimating daily energy expenditure. Use of video raises obvious privacy concerns. Several privacy enhancements have been proposed such as modifying a person in video by introducing blur, silhouette, or bounding-box. Person extraction is fundamental in video-based assistive monitoring and degraded in the presence of privacy enhancements; however, privacy enhancements have characteristics that can opportunistically be adapted to. We propose two adaptive algorithms for improving assistive monitoring goal performance with privacy-enhanced video: specific-color hunter and edge-void filler. A nonadaptive algorithm, foregrounding, is used as the default algorithm for the adaptive algorithms. We compare nonadaptive and adaptive algorithms with 5 common privacy enhancements on the effectiveness of 8 automated monitoring goals. The nonadaptive algorithm performance on privacy-enhanced video is degraded from raw video. However, adaptive algorithms can compensate for the degradation. Energy estimation accuracy in our tests degraded from 90.9% to 83.9%, but the adaptive algorithms significantly compensated by bringing the accuracy up to 87.1%. Similarly, fall detection accuracy degraded from 1.0 sensitivity to 0.86 and from 1.0 specificity to 0.79, but the adaptive algorithms compensated accuracy back to 0.92 sensitivity and 0.90 specificity. Additionally, the adaptive algorithms were computationally more efficient than the nonadaptive algorithm, averaging 1.7% more frames processed per second.

References

  1. Anderson, D., Luke, R. H., Keller, J. M., Skubic, M., Rantz, M., and Aud, M. 2009. Linguistic summarization of video for fall detection using voxel person and fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the Conference on ACM Computer Vision and Image Understanding. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bodson, M. and Groszkiewicz, J. E. 1997. Multivariable adaptive algorithms for reconfigurable flight control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 5, 2, 217--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bourke, A. K., O’Brien, J. V., and Lyons, G. M. 2007. Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm. Gait Posture 26, 194--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Crouter, S. E., Schneider, P. L., Karabulut, M., and Bassett Jr., D. R. 2003. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Medicine Sci. Sports Exer. 35, 1455--1460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W, Skubic, M., and Hussam, A. A. 2004. Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: A pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 29, 2, 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Edgcomb, A. and Vahid, F. 2012a. Automated fall detection on privacy-enhanced video. In Conference Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edgcomb, A. and Vahid, F. 2012b. MNFL: The monitoring and notification flow language for assistive monitoring. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Edgcomb, A. and Vahid, F. 2012e. Privacy perception and fall detection accuracy for in-home video assistive monitoring with privacy enhancements. ACM SIGHIT (Special Interest Group on Health Informatics) Record. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Edgcomb, A. and Vahid, F. 2013a. Automated in-home assistive monitoring with privacy-enhanced video. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Edgcomb, A. and Vahid, F. 2013b. Estimating daily energy expenditure from video for assistive monitoring. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Guo, Z., Zhuo, M., and Jiang, G. 2008. Adaptive sensor placement and boundary estimation for monitoring mass objects. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man., Cybern. B, Cybern. 38, 1, 222--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Helal, S., Mann, W., El-Zabadani, H., King, J., Kaddoura, Y., and Jansen, E. 2005. The Gator Tech Smart House: A programmable pervasive space. IEEE Trans. Comput. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jain, R., Kasturi, R., and Schunck, B. G. 1995. Machine Vision. McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jakicic, J. M., Marcus, M., Gallagher, K. I., Randall, C., Thomas, E., Goss, F. L., and Robertson, R. J. 2004. Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Med. 36, 897--904.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaewtrakulpong, P. and Bowden, R. 2001. An improved adaptive background mixture model for real-time tracking with shadow detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Advanced Video Based Surveillance Systems (AVBS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, K., Chalidabhongse, T. H., Harwood, D., and Davis, L. 2005. Real-time foreground-background segmentation using codebook model. Real-Time Imag. 11, 3, 172--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Liu, L., Popescu, M., Skubic, M., Yardibi, T., and Cuddihy, P. 2011. Automatic fall detection based on Doppler radar motion signature. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Petersson, O. and Moffat, A. 1992. A framework for adaptive sorting. In Proceedings of the 3rd Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rashidi, P. and Cook, D. J. 2009. Keeping the resident in the loop: Adapting the smart home to the user. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man., Cybern. A, Syst., Humans. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rougier, C., Meunier, J., St-Arnaud, A., and Rousseau, J. 2007. Fall detection from human shape and motion history using video surveillance. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schoeller, D. A., Ravussin, E., Schutz, Y., Acheson, K. J., Baertschi, P., and Jequier, E. 1986. Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water. Amer. J. Physiol.: Regulat., Integr., Comp. Physiol. 240, 823--830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sotoma, I. and Madeira, E. R. M. 2001. Adaptation---Algorithms to adapt fault monitoring and their implementation on CORBA. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications. 219--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stauffer, C. and Grimson, W. E. L. 1999. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 246--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wood, A., Virone, G., Doan, T., Cao, Q., Selavo, L., Wu, Y., Fang, L., He, Z., Lin, S., and Stankovic, J. 2006. ALARM-NET: Wireless sensor networks for assistive-living and residential monitoring. Computer Science Department, University of Virginia. Tech. rep.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yao, N., Sclabassi, R. J., Liu, Q., Yang, J., Fernstrom, J. D., Fernstrom, M. H., and Sum, M. 2007. A video processing approach to the study of obesity. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME). 1727--1730.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accurate and Efficient Algorithms that Adapt to Privacy-Enhanced Video for Improved Assistive Monitoring

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 4, Issue 3
        October 2013
        113 pages
        ISSN:2158-656X
        EISSN:2158-6578
        DOI:10.1145/2523025
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2013
        • Revised: 1 August 2013
        • Accepted: 1 August 2013
        • Received: 1 November 2012
        Published in tmis Volume 4, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader