skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2505518acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting user activity level in social networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The study of users' social behaviors has gained much research attention since the advent of various social media such as Facebook, Renren and Twitter. A major kind of applications is to predict a user's future activities based on his/her historical social behaviors. In this paper, we focus on a fundamental task: to predict a user's future activity levels in a social network, e.g. weekly activeness, active or inactive. This problem is closely related to Social Customer Relationship Management (Social CRM). Compared to traditional CRM, the three properties: user diversity, social influence, and dynamic nature of social networks, raise new challenges and opportunities to Social CRM. Firstly, the user diversity property implies that a global predictive model may not be precise for all users. On the other hand, historical data of individual users are too sparse to build precisely personalized models. Secondly, the social influence property suggests that relationships between users can be embedded to further boost prediction results on individual users. Finally, the dynamical nature of social networks means that users' behaviors may keep changing over time. To address these challenges, we develop a personalized and social regularized time-decay model for user activity level prediction. Experiments on the social media Renren validate the effectiveness of our proposed model compared with some baselines including traditional supervised learning methods and node classification methods in social networks.

References

  1. D. Aberdeen, O. Pacovsky, and A. Slater. The learning behind the gmail priority inbox. In NIPS 2010 Workshop on Learning on Cores, Clusters and Clouds, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Abramson and M. Kuperman. Social games in a social network. Physical Review E, 63(3):030901, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. A. F. Almeida. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In Internet Measurement Conference, pages 49--62, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Blanzieri and A. Bryl. A survey of learning-based techniques of email spam filtering. Artif. Intell. Rev., 29(1):63--92, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Buttle. Customer Relationship Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1st edition, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Cheng and E. Cantú-Paz. Personalized click prediction in sponsored search. In WSDM, pages 351--360, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Clauset, M. E. J. Newman, and C. Moore. C moore: Finding community structure in very large networks. http://www.arxiv.org/abs/condmat/0408187, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Cunha, R. Teixeira, D. Veitch, and C. Diot. Predicting and tracking internet path changes. In SIGCOMM, pages 122--133, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. S. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram. Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07, pages 271--280, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Dasgupta, R. Singh, B. Viswanathan, D. Chakraborty, S. Mukherjea, A. A. Nanavati, and A. Joshi. Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. In EDBT, pages 668--677, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Domingos. MetaCost: a general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. In KDD, pages 155--164, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Domingos. A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM, 55(10):78--87, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Dror, D. Pelleg, O. Rokhlenko, and I. Szpektor. Churn prediction in new users of yahoo! answers. In Mille et al. {26}, pages 829--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Dror, D. Pelleg, O. Rokhlenko, and I. Szpektor. Churn prediction in new users of yahoo! answers. In Mille et al. {26}, pages 829--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Evgeniou and M. Pontil. Regularized multi--task learning. In KDD, pages 109--117, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Greenberg. CRM at the speed of light: Capturing and keeping customers in Internet real time. Mcgraw-Hill, 4th edition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. I. Guyon, V. Lemaire, M. Boullé, G. Dror, and D. Vogel. Analysis of the kdd cup 2009: Fast scoring on a large orange customer database. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 7:1--22, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Hamilton. Time series analysis, volume 2. Cambridge Univ Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Huang, M. Chen, B. Luo, and D. Lee. Predicting aggregate social activities using continuous-time stochastic process. In CIKM, pages 982--991, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Jahrer, A. Toscher, J.-Y. Lee, J. Deng, H. Zhang, and J. Spoelstra. Ensemble of collaborative filtering and feature engineered models for click through rate prediction. In KDDCup Workshop, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Karnstedt, M. Rowe, J. Chan, H. Alani, and C. Hayes. The effect of user features on churn in social networks. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Kawale, A. Pal, and J. Srivastava. Churn prediction in mmorpgs: A social influence based approach. In CSE (4), pages 423--428, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. Lerman, S. Intagorn, J.-H. Kang, and R. Ghosh. Using proximity to predict activity in social networks. In Mille et al. {26}, pages 555--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Lin and A. Kolcz. Large-scale machine learning at twitter. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 793--804, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Ma, T. C. Zhou, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Improving recommender systems by incorporating social contextual information. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 29(2):9, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Mille, F. L. Gandon, J. Misselis, M. Rabinovich, and S. Staab, editors. Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2012, Lyon, France, April 16-20, 2012 (Companion Volume). ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. T. P. Minka. A comparison of numerical optimizers for logistic regression. Technical Report, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R. J. Oentaryo, E.-P. Lim, D. Lo, F. Zhu, and P. K. Prasetyo. Collective churn prediction in social network. In ASONAM, pages 210--214, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. J. Pan and Q. Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10):1345--1359, October 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Richter, E. Yom-Tov, and N. Slonim. Predicting customer churn in mobile networks through analysis of social groups. In SDM, pages 732--741, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. P. Sarkar, D. Chakrabarti, and M. I. Jordan. Nonparametric link prediction in dynamic networks. In ICML, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. A. Sittig and M. Zuckerberg. Managing information about relationships in a social network via a social timeline, 2010. US Patent 7,725,492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. P. Smith and Z. Zook. Marketing communications: integrating offline and online with social media. Kogan Page, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. J. Subhlok, J. M. Stichnoth, D. R. O'hallaron, and T. Gross. Exploiting task and data parallelism on a multicomputer. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 28(7):13--22, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha, and P. K. Gummadi. On the evolution of user interaction in facebook. In WOSN, pages 37--42, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. C. Wilson, B. Boe, A. Sala, K. P. N. Puttaswamy, and B. Y. Zhao. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In EuroSys, pages 205--218, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. Yang, X. Wei, M. S. Ackerman, and L. A. Adamic. Activity lifespan: An analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. T. Yang, R. Jin, Y. Chi, and S. Zhu. Combining link and content for community detection: a discriminative approach. In KDD, pages 927--936, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Y. Zhu, E. Zhong, Z. Lu, and Q. Yang. Feature engineering for place category classification. In Nokia Mobile Data Challenge Workshop, in conjunction with Pervasive'12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predicting user activity level in social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2013
      2612 pages
      ISBN:9781450322638
      DOI:10.1145/2505515

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate143of848submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader