skip to main content
10.1145/2501907.2501934acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The 20th century was based on local linear engineering of complicated systems. We made cars, airplanes and chemical plants for example. The 21st century has opened a new basis for holistic non-linear design of complex systems, such as the Internet and air traffic management. Interconnectivity, communication and interaction are major attributes of our evolving society. But, more interestingly, we have started to understand that chaos theory may be more important than reductionism, to better understand and thrive on Earth. Systems need to be investigated and tested as wholes, which requires a cross-disciplinary approach and new conceptual principles and tools. Consequently, schools cannot continue to only teach isolated disciplines based on simple reductionism. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) should also be integrated together with the Arts to promote creativity together with rationalization, and move (back) to STEAM (with an "A" for Arts). This concept shift emphasizes the possibility of longer-term socio-technical futures instead of short-term financial predictions that currently lead to uncontrolled economies. Human-centred design (HCD) can contribute to not only improving education technologies, systems and practices, but also as a discipline offering an integrated approach to learning by doing, expressing and critiquing, exploring possible futures, and understanding complex systems: HCD supports learning thinking.

References

  1. Boy, G. A. (2013). Orchestrating Human-Centred Design. Springer, U.K. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boy, G. A. (2012). What Space can contribute to Global Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Proceedings of the 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Naples, Italy, IAC-12-E1-6-4, International Astronautical Federation (IAF), Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boy, G. A. (2009). The Orchestra: A Conceptual Model for Function Allocation and Scenario-based Engineering in Multi-Agent Safety-Critical Systems. Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, L. Nooros et al. (Eds.), Otaniemi, Helsinki area, Finland; 30 September-2 October, pp. 64--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Boy, G. A. (1998). Cognitive function analysis. Ablex/Greenwood, Westport, CT, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Coze, Y., Kawski, N., Kulka, T., Sire, P., Sottocasa, P. & Bloem, J. (2009). Virtual Concept >> Real Profit withDigital Manufacturing and Simulation. Dassault Systèmes and Sogeti. LINE UP Book & Media, Drukkerij Bariet BV, Steenwijk, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook 'Friends:' Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, Issue 4, Wiley Online Library, pp. 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lahlou, S. (2005). Cognitive Attractors and Activity-Based Design: Augmented Meeting Rooms. Human Computer Interaction International. 22-27 July, Las Vegas, NA, USA. Vol. 1 - Engineering Psychology, Health and Computer System Design, pp. 512--521.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Montaigne, M. (1854). Essais. Paris: Firmin-Didot frères, chap. 26, livre I, p. 64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (2012). Connected Minds: Technology and Today's Learners. Educational Research & Innovation, OECD Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Plattner, H., Meinel, C. & Leifer, L. Eds. (2011). Design Thinking. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Capstone Pub. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schank, R. C. (1983). Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stiegler, B. & Arthur, T. (2012). The Re-Enchantment of the World: The Value of the Human Spirit versus Industrial Populism (Philosophy and Cultural Theory). Continuum, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thuan, T. X. (1998). Le Chaos et l'harmonie -- La fabrication du reel. Folio Essais, Gallimard, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Watkins, S. C. (2009). The Young and the Digital: What Migration to Social-Networking Sites, Games, and Anytime, Anywhere Media Means for Our Future. Boston: Beacon Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking

              Recommendations

              Reviews

              Stewart Mark Godwin

              The title and abstract of this paper refer to the idea of incorporating arts into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The author makes several broad statements about the failures of the education system, but offers only rhetoric as a solution. As a professional educator, I have observed this type of discussion in the public domain on a regular basis. The author raises some valid points, but most of these are well known, already understood, and being addressed in a number of educational systems across the Western world. The discussion highlights the lack of variety in assessment tasks in education systems, and points out the prevalence of multiple-choice tests; these statements could have been supported by facts. In terms of educational delivery, the author suggests that students should have access to technology that connects and engages with the learning environment. This is another moot point, since hybrid, online, and e-learning systems already allow students the flexibility to learn anywhere and at anytime. Unfortunately, the author only briefly mentions the notion of including arts in STEM in the introduction. In conclusion, while I found this discussion interesting, it raises the same topics that have been discussed in numerous papers on educational systems and adds very little to the overall debate. Online Computing Reviews Service

              Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

              Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                ECCE '13: Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
                August 2013
                220 pages
                ISBN:9781450322515
                DOI:10.1145/2501907

                Copyright © 2013 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 26 August 2013

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader