skip to main content
10.1145/2493394.2493425acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Using cognitive load theory to improve the efficiency of learning to program

Published:12 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

My research seeks to adopt existing knowledge from educational psychology and instructional design and apply it to the field of computer science education in an effort to make learning programming more time efficient. Specifically I will use cognitive load theory to improve the efficiency of learning to program. I have identified my first two studies: identifying the most appropriate modality for code segment explanations and determining the benefits of worked examples in learning programming.

References

  1. E. Soloway and K. Ehrlich, "Empirical studies of programming knowledge," Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, no. 5, pp. 595--609, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. DuBoulay, "Some Difficulties of Learning to Program," in Studying the novice programmer, E. Soloway and J. C. Spohrer, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. C. Clark and R. E. Mayer, E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Pfeiffer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. E. Mayer, Multi-Media Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. K. Atkinson, S. J. Derry, A. Renkl, and D. Wortham, "Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research," Review of educational research, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 181--214, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Sweller and G. A. Cooper, "The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra," Cognition and Instruction, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59--89, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Ward and J. Sweller, "Structuring effective worked examples," Cognition and instruction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1--39, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Renkl, R. Stark, H. Gruber, and H. Mandl, "Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations," Contemporary educational psychology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 90--108, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. K. Benda, A. Bruckman, and M. Guzdial, "When Life and Learning Do Not Fit: Challenges of Workload and Communication in Introductory Computer Science Online," Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 15:1--15:38, Nov. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Cooper and J. Sweller, "Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer.," Journal of educational psychology, vol. 79, no. 4, p. 347, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using cognitive load theory to improve the efficiency of learning to program

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '13: Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research
      August 2013
      202 pages
      ISBN:9781450322430
      DOI:10.1145/2493394

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '13 Paper Acceptance Rate22of70submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader