ABSTRACT
Many applications in wireless networks depend on accurate localization services to operate properly. Trilateration is a widely used range-based localization method that can operate in polynomial time, given that the distance measurements are precise. However in real-world, range measurements tend to have errors due to internal and external factors. Flip ambiguities that occur during trilateration as a consequence of imprecise range measurements turn localization via trilateration into an intractable problem. In this paper, we analyze ip ambiguities due to range measurement errors and propose a heuristic solution that tries to minimize the number of ips in trilateration even in highly noisy environments. We simulate our algorithms under various noise scenarios and observe that the use of our heuristic based solution effectively decreases the number of ips in trilateration and increases the accuracy of the localization.
- H. Akcan and C. Evrendilek. GPS-free directional localization via dual wireless radios. Computer Communications, 35(9):1151--1163, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Akcan, V. Kriakov, H. Brönnimann, and A. Delis. GPS-Free node localization in mobile wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access (MobiDE'06), pages 35--42, Chicago, Illinois, USA, June 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Akcan, V. Kriakov, H. Brönnimann, and A. Delis. Managing cohort movement of mobile sensors via GPS-free and compass-free node localization. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 70(7):743--757, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. D. O. Anderson, I. Shames, G. Mao, and B. Fidan. Formal theory of noisy sensor network localization. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 24(2):684--698, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Aspnes, T. Eren, D. K. Goldenberg, A. S. Morse, W. Whiteley, Y. R. Yang, B. D. O. Anderson, and P. N. Belhumeur. A theory of network localization. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(12):1663--1678, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Aspnes, D. K. Goldenberg, and Y. R. Yang. On the computational complexity of sensor network localization. In First International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks (ALGOSENSORS'04), pages 32--44, Turku, Finland, July 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Boukerche, H. A. B. F. Oliveira, E. F. Nakamura, and A. A. F. Loureiro. Vehicular ad hoc networks: A new challenge for localization-based systems. Computer Communications, 31(12):2838--2849, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Gps-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28--34, October 2000.Google Scholar
- M. Cao, B. D. O. Anderson, and A. S. Morse. Sensor network localization with imprecise distances. Systems & Control Letters, 55(11):887--893, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Čapkun, M. Hamdi, and J.-P. Hubaux. GPS-free Positioning in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Cluster Computing, 5(2):157--167, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. N. Clark, C. J. Colbourn, and D. S. Johnson. Unit disk graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 86(1--3):165--177, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Connelly. Generic global rigidity. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 33(4):549--563, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Doherty, K. Pister, and L. El Ghaoui. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM, pages 1655--1663, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Eren, O. Goldenberg, W. Whiteley, Y. Yang, A. Morse, B. Anderson, and P. Belhumeur. Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization. In INFOCOM, volume 4, pages 2673--2684, Hong Kong, China, March 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Evrendilek and H. Akcan. On the complexity of trilateration with noisy range measurements. Communications Letters, IEEE, 15(10):1097--1099, October 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gezici, Z. Tian, G. Giannakis, H. Kobayashi, A. Molisch, H. Poor, and Z. Şahinoğlu. Localization via ultra-wideband radios: a look at positioning aspects for future sensor networks. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 22(4):70--84, July 2005.Google Scholar
- F. Gustafsson and F. Gunnarsson. Mobile positioning using wireless networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pages 41--53, 2005.Google Scholar
- T. He, C. Huang, B. M. Blum, J. A. Stankovic, and T. F. Abdelzaher. Range-free localization and its impact on large scale sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embedded Comput. Syst., 4(4):877--906, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hightower and G. Borriello. Location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Computer, 34(8):57--66, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Huang, C. Yu, and B. Anderson. Understanding error propagation in multi-hop sensor network localization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 10.1109/TIE.2012.2236991, 2012.Google Scholar
- R. Iyengar and B. Sikdar. Scalable and distributed GPS free positioning for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC'03), pages 338--342, Anchorage, AK, USA, May 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Liu, Y. Zhang, and F. Zhao. Robust distributed node localization with error management. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'06), pages 250--261, Florence, Italy, May 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Moore, J. Leonard, D. Rus, and S. Teller. Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'04), pages 50--61, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Nagpal, H. E. Shrobe, and J. Bachrach. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Processing In Sensor Networks (IPSN'03), pages 333--348, Palo Alto, California, USA, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. In INFOCOM, volume 3, pages 1734--1743, March 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Park, E. D. Demaine, and S. J. Teller. Moving-baseline localization. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing In Sensor Networks (IPSN'08), pages 15--26, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, April 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Patwari, J. N. Ash, S. Kyperountas, A. O. Hero III, R. L. Moses, and N. S. Correal. Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 22(4):54--69, July 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Porretta, P. Nepa, G. Manara, and F. Giannetti. Location, location, location. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, pages 20--29, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. B. Priyantha, H. Balakrishnan, E. Demaine, and S. Teller. Anchor-free distributed localization in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03), pages 340--341, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Şahinoğlu, S. Gezici, and I. Güvenç. Ultra-wideband Positioning Systems: Theoretical Limits, Ranging Algorithms, and Protocols. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Savarese, J. M. Rabaey, and K. Langendoen. Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In USENIX, pages 317--327, Monterey, CA, USA, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Savvides, C.-C. Han, and M. B. Strivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'01), pages 166--179, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. B. Saxe. Embeddability of weighted graphs in k-space is strongly np-hard. In 17th Allerton Conf. Commun. Control Comput., pages 480--489, 1979.Google Scholar
- R. Sugihara and R. Gupta. Sensor localization with deterministic accuracy guarantee. In INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1772--1780, april 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Yemini. Some theoretical aspects of position-location problems. In 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 1--8, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1979. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Zhao, and Z. Jia. Theoretic analysis of unique localization for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(3):623--634, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Reducing the number of flips in trilateration with noisy range measurements
Recommendations
Quality of Trilateration: Confidence-Based Iterative Localization
The proliferation of wireless and mobile devices has fostered the demand for context-aware applications, in which location is one of the most significant contexts. Multilateration, as a basic building block of localization, however, has not yet overcome ...
Quality of Trilateration: Confidence Based Iterative Localization
ICDCS '08: Proceedings of the 2008 The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing SystemsThe proliferation of wireless and mobile devices has fostered the demand of context aware applications. Location is one of the most significant contexts. Multilateration, as a basic building block of localization, however, have not yet overcome the ...
Range-free localization approach for M2M communication system using mobile anchor nodes
Most existing range-free localization approaches use static anchor nodes. These approaches cannot be used for large scale Machine to Machine (M2M) communication networks since a fixed number of static anchor nodes cannot localize Machine Type ...
Comments