skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Letting go: working with the rhythm of participants

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The focus of this study is a community of families separated by prison. Some parts of this community do not engage with the support offered to it, regardless of delivery mechanism. In this study, we used a participatory design approach to community informatics to explore why some do not engage with the support offered and the potential for service design to increase engagement. This is a community where on-line service delivery is a method used to deliver information and support and so taking a community informatics lens helps to inform both on and off-line service design. This paper explores the use of four participatory design principles selected to improve the extent and quality of participation: ceding control, segmentation, situation and envisioning control. In this first phase of the study we discovered how the principle of feedback between segmented participant groups helps to develop an understanding of the service design needs for the whole community and is a potential technique for community informatics and service design in general to improve the quality of input to community service design.

References

  1. Durose, C. Beebeejaun, Y., Rees, J., Richardson, J., Richardson, L. Towards Co-Production in Research with Communities. Connected Communities, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll, J., M., and Rosson, M., B. Participatory design in community informatics Design Studies 28: (2007) 243--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Akama, Y., Politics makes strange bedfellows: addressing the 'messy' power dynamics in design practice, in proc of Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference, (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coles-Kemp, L., Ashenden, D.M.A Community-centric engagement: lessons learned from privacy awareness intervention design, Proc of HCI 2012 The 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction (2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Boswell, G., Wedge.P. Imprisoned Fathers and their Children, Jenny Kingsley Publishers, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Codd, H. In the Shadow of Prison: Families, Imprisonment and Criminal Justice, William Publishing, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Condry, R. Families Shamed: The Consequences of Crime for Relatives of Serious Offenders, William Publishing, (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Letting go: working with the rhythm of participants

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader