skip to main content
10.1145/2464576.2482738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Designing a novel hybrid swarm based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for finding DNA motifs

Published:06 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present a novel local search for improving the ability of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms when finding repeated patterns -motifs- in DNA sequences. In the metaheuristic design, two competing goals must be taken into account: exploration and exploitation. Exploration is needed to cover most of the optimization problem search space and provide a reliable estimation of the global optimum. In turn, exploitation is also important since normally the solutions refinement allows the achievement of better results. In this work we take advantage of both concepts by combining the exploration capabilities of a population-based evolutionary algorithm and the power of a local search, especially designed to optimize the Motif Discovery Problem (MDP). For doing this, we have implemented a new hybrid multiobjective metaheuristic based on Artificial Bee Colony (ABC). After analyzing the results achieved by this algorithm, named Hybrid-MOABC (H-MOABC), and comparing them with those achieved by three multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and thirteen well-known biological tools, we prove that the hybridization computes accurate biological predictions on real genetic instances in an optimum way. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, the results presented in this paper improve those presented in the literature.

References

  1. Che, D. Song, Y., and Rashedd, K. MDGA: Motif discovery using a genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO'05) (2005), 447--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 2 (2002), 182--197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D'haeseleer, P. What are DNA sequence motifs? Nature Biotechnology 24, 4 (2006), 423--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fogel, G. B., Porto, V. W., Varga, G., Dow, E. R., Crave, A. M., Powers, D. M., Harlow, H. B., Su, E. W., Onyia, J. E., and Su, C. Evolutionary computation for discovery of composite transcription factor binding sites. Nucleic Acids Research 36, 21 (2008), e142, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fogel, G. B., Weekes, D. G., Varga, G., Dow, E. R., Harlow, H. B., Onyia, J. E., and Su, C. Discovery of sequence motifs related to coexpression of genes using evolutionary computation. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 13 (2004), 3826--3835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. González-Álvarez, D. L., Vega-Rodríguez, M. A., Gómez-Pulido, J. A., and Sánchez-Pérez, J. M. Comparing multiobjective swarm intelligence metaheuristics for DNA motif discovery. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26, 1 (2012), 341--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Karaboga, D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report-tr06, Erciyes University, Turkey (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaya, M. MOGAMOD: Multi-objective genetic algorithm for motif discovery. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 2 (2009), 1039--1047. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Liu, F. F. M., Tsai, J. J. P., Chen, R. M., Chen, S. N., and Shih, S. H. FMGA: finding motifs by genetic algorithm. Fourth IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE'04) (2004), 459--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lones, M. A., and Tyrrell, A. M. Regulatory motif discovery using a population clustering evolutionary algorithm. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 4, 3 (2007), 403--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shao, L., and Chen, Y. Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm integrating tabu search for motif discovery. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM'09) (2009), 415--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shao, L., Chen, Y., and Abraham, A. Motif discovery using evolutionary algorithms. International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SOCPAR'09) (2009), 420--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sheskin, D. J. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 4th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Stine, M., Dasgupta, D., and Mukatira, S. Motif discovery in upstream sequences of coordinately expressed genes. The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC'03) (2003), 1596--1603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Talbi, E.-G. A taxonomy of hybrid metaheuristics. Journal of Heuristics 8 (2002), 541--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Talbi, E.-G. Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation. John Wiley & Sons (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tompa, M., Li, N., Bailey, T. L., Church, G. M., De Moor, B., Eskin, E., Favorov, A. V., Frith, M. C., Fu, Y., Kent, W. J., Makeev, V. J., Mironov, A. A., Noble, W. S., Pavesi, G., Pesole, G., Régnier, M., Simonis, N., Sinha, S. Thijs, G., Van Helden, J., Vandenbogaert, M., Weng, Z., Workman, C., Ye, C., and Zhu, Z. Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites. Nature Biotechnology 23, 1 (2005), 137--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wei, Z., and Jensen, S. GAME: detecting cis-regulatory elements using a genetic algorithm. Bioinformatics 22, 13 (2006), 1577--1584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zare-Mirakabad, F., Ahrabian, H., Sadeghi, M., Hashemifar, S., Nowzari-Dalini, A., and Goliaei, B. Genetic algorithm for dyad pattern finding in DNA sequences. Genes & Genetic Systems 84, 1 (2009), 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., and Thiele, L. SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical report tik-report 103, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzeland (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zitzler, E., and Thiele, L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3, 4 (1999), 257--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing a novel hybrid swarm based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for finding DNA motifs

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                GECCO '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
                July 2013
                1798 pages
                ISBN:9781450319645
                DOI:10.1145/2464576
                • Editor:
                • Christian Blum,
                • General Chair:
                • Enrique Alba

                Copyright © 2013 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 6 July 2013

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • tutorial

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

                Upcoming Conference

                GECCO '24
                Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
                July 14 - 18, 2024
                Melbourne , VIC , Australia

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader