skip to main content
10.1145/2371574.2371618acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual search on a mobile device while walking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

As smartphone usage increases, safety concerns have arisen. Previous research suggested cognitive impairments while using mobile devices in walking conditions. Mobile user interfaces that are designed in ways not to require users' full attention may mitigate the safety concerns. Primary focus of this research was on the perception process during visual search rather than the physical target selection by finger tapping, which most previous research focused on. The effects of object size, contrast, and target location on mobile devices while walking and standing were examined. A serial visual search using "T" and "L" shapes on a mobile device was conducted, which controlled for the physical target selection involvement. The results showed that walking, bigger object size, and the target position in the outer area of the mobile device display slowed the visual search reaction time. This suggests mobile interface improvement possibilities by proper object sizing and placement.

References

  1. Android user interface guidelines. Retrieved from http://developer.android.com/guide/practices/ui_guidelines/icon_design.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple iPhone human Interface guidelines. Retrieved from http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/userexperience/conceptual/mobilehig/MobileHIG.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BergInsight: Smartphone markets and technologies (2nd ed.). (2011). Retrieved from http://berginsight.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ComScore Report: Smartphone market share. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_ReleasesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Drewes, H., Luca, A. D., & Schmidt, A. (2007). Eye-gaze interaction for mobile phones. Mobility: Proc. of 4th International Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems (pp. 364--371). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Everett, S. P., & Byrne, M. D. (2004). Unintended effects: Varying icon spacing changes users' visual search strategy. Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proc. of CHI 2004 (pp. 695--702). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hasegawa, S., Miyao, M., Matsunuma, S., Fujikake, K., & Omori, M. (2008). Effects of aging and display contrast on the legibility of characters on mobile phone screens. 21st Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunication, 2(4), 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatfield, J., & Murphy, S. (2007). The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behavior at signalised and unsignalised intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Honan, M. (2007). Apple unveils iPhone. Macworld. Retrieved from http://www.macworld.com/article/54769/2007/01/iphone.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyman, I. E., Boss S. M., Wise, B. M., McKenzie, K. E., & Caggiano, J. M. (2010). Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 597--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. (2008). Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. Proc. of MobileHCI 2008 (pp. 109--188). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, D., Chao, C., Ko, Y., & Shen, I. (2011). Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. (2007). How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(9), 759--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ling, J., & Schaik, P. (2006). The influence of line spacing and text alignment on visual search of web pages. Displays, 8(2), 60--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M., and Newton, D. (2005). Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. Proc. of MobileHCI 2005 (pp. 122--128). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nagamatsu, T., Yamamoto, M., & Sato, H. (2010). MobiGaze: Development of a gaze interface for handheld mobile devices. Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proc. of the 28th of the International conference extended abstracts (pp. 3349--3354). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. NASA Ames Research Center: Manual of NASA Task Load Index (TLX), v 1.0. (1987). Retrieved from http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nasar, J., Hecht, P., & Wener, R. (2008). Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 69--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 15583--15587. doi: 10.1073/pnas0903620106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Park, Y. S., Han, S. H., Park, J., & Cho, Y. (2008). Touch key design for target selection on a mobile phone. Proc. of MobileHCI 2008 (pp. 423--426). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Richtel, M. (2010). Forget gum. Walking and using phone is risky. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/17/technology/17distracted.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schaik, P. V., & Ling, J. (2001). The effects of frame layout and differential background contrast on visual search performance in web pages. Interacting with Computers, 13, 513--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Schildbach, B., & Rukzio, E. (2010). Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking. Proc. of MobileHCI 2010 (pp. 93--102). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stavrinos, D., Byington, K. W., & Schwebel, D. C. (2009). Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics, 123, 179--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tseng,Y., & Howes, A. (2008). The adaptation of visual search strategy to expected information gain. Proc. of CHI 2008 (pp. 1075--1084). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Vadas, K., Patel, N., Lyons, K., Starner, T., & Jacko, J. (2006). Reading on-the-go: a comparison of audio and hand-held displays. Proc. of MobileHCI 2006 (pp. 221--226). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vlaskamp, B. N. S., Over, E. A. B., & Hooge, I. T. (2005). Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing. Experimental Brain Research, 167(2), 246--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Review Neuroscience, 5, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zuffi, S., Brambilla, C., Beretta, G., & Scala, P. (2007). Human computer interaction: legibility and contrast. In R. Cucchiara (Ed.), Proc. of International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing 2007 (pp. 241--246). New York: IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visual search on a mobile device while walking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2012
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450311052
      DOI:10.1145/2371574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader