ABSTRACT
The Linked Open Data (LOD) Cloud has gained significant traction over the past few years. With over 275 interlinked datasets across diverse domains such as life science, geography, politics, and more, the LOD Cloud has the potential to support a variety of applications ranging from open domain question answering to drug discovery.
Despite its significant size (approx. 30 billion triples), the data is relatively sparely interlinked (approx. 400 million links). A semantically richer LOD Cloud is needed to fully realize its potential. Data in the LOD Cloud are currently interlinked mainly via the owl:sameAs property, which is inadequate for many applications. Additional properties capturing relations based on causality or partonomy are needed to enable the answering of complex questions and to support applications.
In this paper, we present a solution to enrich the LOD Cloud by automatically detecting partonomic relationships, which are well-established, fundamental properties grounded in linguistics and philosophy. We empirically evaluate our solution across several domains, and show that our approach performs well on detecting partonomic properties between LOD Cloud data.
- K. Alexander, R. Cyganiak, M. Hausenblas, and J. Zhao. Describing Linked Datasets -- On the Design and Usage of voiD, the 'Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets'. In WWW2009 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2009), Madrid, Spain, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. Artale, E. Franconi, N. Guarino, and L. Pazzi. Part-whole relations in object-centered systems: An overview. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 20(3):347--383, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael K. Bergman and Frédérick Giasson. UMBEL ontology, volume 1, technical documentation. Technical Report 1, Structured Dynamics, 2008. Available from: http://umbel.org/doc/UMBELOntology_vA1.pdf.Google Scholar
- Christian Bizer, Tom Heath, and Tim Berners Lee. Linked data - the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3):1--22, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Bizer, Jens Lehmann, Georgi Kobilarov, Sören Auer, Christian Becker, Richard Cyganiak, and Sebastian Hellmann. DBpedia-A crystallization point for the Web of Data. Journal of Web Semantics, 7(3):154--165, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Carlson, Justin Betteridge, Bryan Kisiel, Burr Settles, Estevam R. Hruschka Jr., and Tom M. Mitchell. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2010), 2010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Casati and A.C. Varzi. Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. The MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Namyoun Choi, Il-Yeol Song, and Hyoil Han. A survey on ontology mapping. SIGMOD Rec., 35(3):34--41, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp Cimiano, Andreas Hotho, and Steffen Staab. Learning concept hierarchies from text corpora using formal concept analysis. J. Artif. Int. Res., 24:305--339, August 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jérôme Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko. Ontology matching. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (DE), 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christiane Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (Language, Speech, and Communication). The MIT Press, illustrated edition edition, May 1998.Google Scholar
- David Ferrucci, Eric Brown, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, James Fan, David Gondek, Aditya A Kalyanpur, Adam Lally, J William Murdock, Eric Nyberg, and John Prager. Building watson: An overview of the deepqa project. AI Magazine, 31(3):59--79, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Gerstl and S. Pribbenow. A conceptual theory of part-whole relations and its applications. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 20(3):305--322, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Girju, A. Badulescu, and D. Moldovan. Automatic discovery of part-whole relations. Computational Linguistics, 32(1):83--135, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Hausenblas. Exploiting linked data to build web applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 13:68--73, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marti A. Hearst. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics -- Volume 2, COLING '92, pages 539--545, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Hitzler, M. Krötzsch, B. Parsia, P.F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Rudolph, editors. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Primer. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.Google Scholar
- Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, and Mike Dean. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004, 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.Google Scholar
- Prateek Jain, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Z. Yeh, Kunal Verma, and Amit P. Sheth. Linked Data is Merely More Data. In Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence, pages 82--86. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2010.Google Scholar
- Prateek Jain, Peter Z. Yeh, Kunal Verma, Cory A. Henson, and Amit P. Sheth. SPARQL query re-writing using partonomy based transformation rules. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics, GeoS '09, pages 140--158, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adila Krisnadhi, Frederick Maier, and Pascal Hitzler. OWL and Rules. In Reasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data -- 7th International Summer School 2011, Galway, Ireland, August 23-27, 2011, Tutorial Lectures, volume 6848 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 382--415. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markus Krötzsch, Frederick Maier, Adila A. Krisnadhi, and Pascal Hitzler. A better uncle for OWL: Nominal schemas for integrating rules and ontologies. In Proceedings of the 20th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW2011, Hyderabad, India, March/April 2011, pages 645--654. ACM, New York, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jens Lehmann and Pascal Hitzler. Concept learning in description logics using refinement operators. Machine Learning, 78(1--2):203--250, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Motik, P.F. Patel-Schneider, and B. Parsia, editors. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/.Google Scholar
- Boris Motik, Ulrike Sattler, and Rudi Studer. Query answering for OWL DL with rules. Journal of Web Semantics, 3(1):41--60, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Pantel and Marco Pennacchiotti. Espresso: leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pages 113--120, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan Rector, Chris Welty, Natasha Noy, and Evan Wallace. Simple part-whole relations in OWL Ontologies available at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/bestpractices/oep/simplepartwhole/, August 2005.Google Scholar
- Barry Smith. The basic tools of formal ontology. In Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 1998.Google Scholar
- Nectaria Tryfona and Max J. Egenhofer. Consistency among parts and aggregates: A computational model. Transactions in GIS, 1(3):189--206, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Willem van Hage, Hap Kolb, and Guus Schreiber. A method for learning part-whole relations. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2006, volume 4273 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 723--735. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Volz, C. Bizer, M. Gaedke, and G. Kobilarov. Silk--A Link Discovery Framework for the Web of Data. In 2nd Linked Data on the Web Workshop (LDOW2009), Madrid, Spain, 2009. Available from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-538/ldow2009_paper13.pdf.Google Scholar
- Julius Volz, Christian Bizer, Martin Gaedke, and Georgi Kobilarov. Discovering and maintaining links on the web of data. In ISWC '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference, pages 650--665, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morton E. Winston, Roger Chaffin, and Douglas Herrmann. A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11(4):417--444, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Moving beyond SameAs with PLATO: partonomy detection for linked data
Recommendations
SameAs networks and beyond: analyzing deployment status and implications of owl:sameAs in linked data
ISWC'10: Proceedings of the 9th international semantic web conference on The semantic web - Volume Part IMillions of owl:sameAs statements have been published on the Web of Data. Due to its unique role and heavy usage in Linked Data integration, owl:sameAs has become a topic of increasing interest and debate. This paper provides a quantitative analysis of ...
Verifying and Mapping the Mereotopology of Upper-Level Ontologies
IC3K 2016: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge ManagementUpper-level ontologies provide an account of the most basic, domain-independent, existing entities, such as time, space, objects, and processes. Ontology verification is the process by which a theory is checked to rule out unintended models, and ...
Logical properties of foundational mereogeometrical relations in bio-ontologies
One aim of this paper is to improve the logical and ontological rigor of the OBO relation ontology by providing axiomatic specifications for logical properties of relations such as part_of, located_in, connected_to, adjacent_to, attached_to, etc. All of ...
Comments