skip to main content
10.1145/2307888.2307903acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In VANETs we trust?: characterizing RF jamming in vehicular networks

Published:25 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study the impact of RF jamming on 802.11p car-to-car communications. We build a jammer on a software defined radio and implement constant, reactive and pilot jamming patterns, whose effectiveness is first measured in an anechoic chamber. We perform extensive experiments in two relevant outdoor scenarios, namely a straight road in an open space as well as a dense building scenario with a crossroad and characterize the performance of 802.11p communications under the impact of constant and reactive RF jamming. The constant jammer is able to dramatically disrupt communication regardless of the scenario. The reactive jammer exhibits a low impact in scenarios with reduced line-of-sight as its jamming success greatly depends on the relative position of the nodes. It is, however, very effective in open-space scenarios. In general, we observe that RF jamming can cause large communication-blind areas. Under these conditions, critical safety applications would simply fail in their purpose of timely warning dissemination.

References

  1. Ambient Noise Immunity (ANI) Patent. http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2005067154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rice University WARP Project. http://warp.rice.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. IEEE 802.11p - Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments, Amendment 6 to 802.11, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) - Multi-channel Operation, July 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Aijaz, B. Bochow, F. Dötzer, A. Festag, M. Gerlach, R. Kroh, and T. Leinmüller. Attacks on Inter Vehicle Communication Systems - an Analysis. In Proc. of WIT, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Bellardo and S. Savage. 802.11 Denial-of-Service Attacks: Real Vulnerabilities and Practical Solutions. In Proc. of USENIX, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Boban, T. T. V. Vinhoza, M. Ferreira, J. Barros, and O. Tonguz. Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(1):15--28, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Briggs, J. Martinez, D. Bare, W. M. Ave, and A. R. Requirements. Power Measurements of OFDM Signals. In Proc. of EMC, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. K. Chaurasia, S. Verma, and G. S. Tomar. Attacks on Anonymity in VANET. In Proc. of CIC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Clancy. Efficient OFDM Denial: Pilot Jamming and Pilot Nulling. In Proc. of ICC, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Festag, R. Baldessari, W. Zhang, and L. Le. CAR-2-X Communication SDK - A Software Toolkit for Rapid Application Development and Experimentations. In Proc. of ICC Workshops, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Gummadi, D. Wetherall, B. Greenstein, and S. Seshan. Understanding and Mitigating the Impact of RF Interference on 802.11 Networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Hamieh, J. Ben-Othman, and L. Mokdad. Detection of Radio Interference Attacks in VANET. In Proc. of GLOBECOM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Harjula, J. Pinola, and J. Prokkola. Performance of IEEE 802.11 Based WLAN Devices under Various Jamming Signals. In Proc. of MILCOM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. IEEE. 802.11 - Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Jiang, Q. Chen, and L. Delgrossi. Optimal Data Rate Selection for Vehicle Safety Communications. In Proc. of VANET, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Karhima, A. Silvennoinen, M. Hall, and S.-G. Haggman. IEEE 802.11b/g WLAN Tolerance to Jamming. In Proc. of MILCOM, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Mangel, O. Klemp, and H. Hartenstein. 5.9 GHz Inter-Vehicle Communication at Intersections: A Validated Non-Line-of-Sight Path-Loss and Fading Model. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Paier, D. Faetani, and C. Mecklenbrauker. Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11p Physical Layer Infrastructure-to-Vehicle Real-World Measurements. In Proc. of ISABEL, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. K. Pelechrinis, I. Broustis, S. Krishnamurthy, and C. Gkantsidis. A Measurement-Driven Anti-Jamming System for 802.11 Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 19(4):1208--1222, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Pelechrinis, M. Iliofotou, and S. Krishnamurthy. Denial of Service Attacks in Wireless Networks: The Case of Jammers. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Schoch, F. Kargl, and T. Leinmüller. Vulnerabilities of Geocast Message Distribution. In Proc. of Autonet, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Segata and R. Lo Cigno. Emergency Braking: A Study of Network and Application Performance. In Proc. of VANET, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Strasser, B. Danev, and S. Čapkun. Detection of Reactive Jamming in Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 7(2):1--16, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. I. Tinnirello, D. Giustiniano, L. Scalia, and G. Bianchi. On the Side-Effects of Proprietary Solutions for Fading and Interference Mitigation in IEEE 802.11b/g Outdoor Links. Computer Networks, 53(2):141--152, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Wilhelm, I. Martinovic, J. B. Schmitt, and V. Lenders. WiSec 2011 Demo: RFReact - A Real-Time Capable and Channel-Aware Jamming Platform. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 15(3):41--42, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. W. Xu, K. Ma, W. Trappe, and Y. Zhang. Jamming Sensor Networks: Attack and Defense Strategies. IEEE Network, 20(3):41--47, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. W. Xu, W. Trappe, Y. Zhang, and T. Wood. The Feasibility of Launching and Detecting Jamming Attacks in Wireless Networks. In Proc. of MobiHoc, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y. Zhang and G. Cao. V-PADA: Vehicle-Platoon-Aware Data Access in VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(5):2326--2339, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. In VANETs we trust?: characterizing RF jamming in vehicular networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      VANET '12: Proceedings of the ninth ACM international workshop on Vehicular inter-networking, systems, and applications
      June 2012
      158 pages
      ISBN:9781450313179
      DOI:10.1145/2307888

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate26of64submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader