skip to main content
10.1145/2212776.2212802acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TravelThrough: a participatory-based guidance system for traveling through disaster areas

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on decentralized individual self-help in the aftermath of a disaster, instead of the traditionally adopted model of centralized disaster response management. It presents the results of a controlled field experiment that compares a new disaster response model involving civilians participating with smartphones with the traditional centralized model. In the new system, the affected people lead themselves to safety, and at the same time serving as distributed active sensors that share observations of the disaster area. The results show that the proposed system is more effective, preferred, and reduces the workload in guiding affected people safely to their destinations.

References

  1. Brinkman, W.-P., Haakma, R., & Bouwhuis, D.G. Theoretical foundation and validity of a componentbased usability questionnaire, Behaviour and Information Technology (2009), 2, no. 28, 121--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cronan, K. Foundations of Emergency Management. The Australian J. of Emergency Management (1998), 13(1), 20--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Drabek, T. E. and McEntire, D. A. Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management (2003), 12(2), 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dynes, R.R. Problems in Emergency Planning. Energy (1983), 8, 653- 660.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dynes, R. R. Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters (1994), 12(2), 141--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Farnham,S., Pedersen,E., Kirkpatrick,R. Observation of Katrina/Rita Groove Deployment: Addressing Social and Communication Challenges of Ephemeral Groups. In Proc. ISCRAM 2006, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gates, D. G. Executive Analysis of Fire Service Operations in Emergency Management (2007), http://www.usfa.fema.govGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodchild, M. F. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal (2007), 69(4), 211--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Guha-Sapir, D., Vos, F., Below, R., and Ponserre, S. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2010: The numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED)(2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gunawan, L. T. Collaboration-Oriented Design of Disaster Response System. Proc. of CHI, ACM Press (2008), 2613--2616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gunawan, L. T., Oomes, A. H. J., Neerincx, M., Brinkman, W-P., and Alers, H. Collaborative situational mapping during emergency response. Proc. of ECCE (2009), 6:1--6:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gunawan, L. T., Alers, H., Brinkman, W-P., Neerincx, M. Distributed collaborative situation-map making for disaster response. Interacting with Computers (2011), 23(4), 308--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunawan, L.T., Fitrianie, S., Brinkman, W-P., Neerincx, M. Utilizing the Potential of the Affected Population and Prevalent Mobile Technology during Disaster Response: Propositions from the Literature. In Proc. of ISCRAM (2012) (In press)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.) Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Holland Press (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IBM e-business case studies: Bullhead city police department (1999), http://www.ibm.com/ebusiness/doc/content/casestudy/47405.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ITO World. Mapping the Crisis - OpenStreetMap Response to Haiti Earthquake (2010). http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2010/01/mapping-crisisopenstreetmap-response.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kean, T. H., and Hamilton, T. H. The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the USA, (2004), W.W. Norton & Company Ltd, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Landgren, J. Designing Information Technology for Emergency response, Doctoral Dissertation, Gothenburg Studies of Informatics (2007), Report 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Law P. and Peng Y. Cellphone, Internet, and the SARS Epidemic. International Workshop on Mobile Technologies and Health: Benefits and Risks (2004). Udine, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. McEntire, D. A. Anticipating Human Behavior in Disasters: Myths, Exaggerations and Realities. In Wiley Pathways Disaster Response and Recovery. John Wiley & Sons (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Neal, D. M. and Phillips, B. D. Effective Emergency Management: Reconsidering the Bureaucratic Approach. Disasters (1995), 19 (4), 327--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Palen L. and Liu S. B. Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In Proc. of CHI (2007). ACM Press, 727736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Palen L., Vieweg S., Sutton J., Liu S. B. and Hughes A. Crisis Informatics: Studying Crisis in a Networked World. In Proc. of the Third International Conference on E-Social Science (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Quarantelli E. L. Research findings on organizational behavior in disasters and their applicability in developing countries, Preliminary Paper #107, Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center (1986), University of Delaware.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Quarantelli E. L. and Dynes R. R. When disaster strikes (It isn't much like what you've heard or read about). Psychology Today (1972), 67--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramaswamy, S., Rogers, M., Crockett, A. D., Feaker, D., and Carter, M. WHISPER -- service integrated incident management system. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, (2006), 11(2), 114--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Samaraweera I. and Corera S. Sahana victim registries: Effectively track disaster victims. In Proc. of ISCRAM (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider S. K. Administrative Breakdowns in the Governmental Response to Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review (2005), 65, 515--517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sobel R. S. and Leeson P. T. Government's Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Public Choice Analysis, Public Choice (2006), 127(1), 55--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tierney, K., Bevc, C., and Kuligowski, E. Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2006), 604, 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M. K., and Perry, R. W. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the USA. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Usahidi (2007) http://haiti.ushahidi.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., Palen, L. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. Proc. of CHI, ACM Press (2010), 1079--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Waugh, W. L. and Streib, G. Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management. Public Administration Review (2006), 66: 131Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Zijlstra, F. R. H. Efficiency in work behaviour: a design approach for modern tools. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. TravelThrough: a participatory-based guidance system for traveling through disaster areas

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2012
          2864 pages
          ISBN:9781450310161
          DOI:10.1145/2212776

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 May 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI PLAY '24
          The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
          October 14 - 17, 2024
          Tampere , Finland

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader