skip to main content
10.1145/2208828.2208838acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning to be energy-wise: discriminative methods for load disaggregation

Published:09 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe an ongoing project which develops an automated residential Demand Response (DR) system that attempts to manage residential loads in accordance with DR signals. In this early stage of the project, we propose an approach for identifying individual appliance consumption from the aggregate load and discuss the effectiveness of load disaggregation techniques when total load data also includes appliances that are unmonitored even during the training phase. We show that simple discriminative methods can directly predict the appliance states (e.g. on, off, standby) and the predicted state can be used to calculate energy consumed by the appliances. We also show that these methods perform substantially better than the generative models of energy consumption that are commonly used. We evaluated the proposed approach using publicly available REDD data set, and our experimental evaluation demonstrates the improvement in accuracy.

References

  1. Demand response program evaluation--Final report Quantum Consulting Inc. and Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Working Group 2 Measurement and Evaluation Committee, and California Edison Company, April 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. The US Department of Energy. The Smart Grid: An introduction, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Ann-Piette, G. Ghatikar, S. Kiliccote, D. Watson, E. Koch, and D. Hennage. Design and operation of an open, interoperable automated demand response infrastructure for commercial buildings. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 9:1--9, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Cappers, C. Goldman, and D. Kathan. Demand Response in U. S. Electricity Markets: Empirical Evidence. Technical Report LBNL-2124E, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Chardon, O. Almen, P. E. Lewis, J. Stromback, and B. Chateau. Demand Response: A decisive breakthrough for Europe. How Europe could save Gigawatts, Billions of Euros and Millions of tons of CO2. Capgemini Report, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Chen, N. Li, S. Low, and J. Doyle. Two market models for demand response in power networks. IEEE SmartGrid Comm, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Q. Dam, S. Mohagheghi, and J. Stoupis. Intelligent demand response scheme for customer side load management. In IEEE Energy 2030 Conference, pages 1--7. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Darby. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption a review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Change, 22(April):33--35, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. European Environment Agency. Final energy consumption by sector (CSI 027/ENER 016) - Assessment published Sep 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Hart. Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE, 80(12):1870--1891, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. E. Koch and M. Piette. Architecture concepts and technical issues for an open, interoperable automated demand response infrastructure. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Kolter, S. Batra, and A. Ng. Energy disaggregation via discriminative sparse coding. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Kolter and M. Johnson. REDD: A public data set for energy disaggregation research. In Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability (SIGKDD), San Diego, CA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Marceau and R. Zmeureanu. Nonintrusive load disaggregation computer program to estimate the energy consumption of major end uses in residential buildings. Energy Conversion and Management, 41(13):1389--1403, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Moon. The expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 13(6):47--60, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. O. Parson, S. Ghosh, M. Weal, and A. Rogers. Using hidden markov models for iterative non-intrusive appliance monitoring. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Powers, B. Margossian, and B. Smith. Using a rule-based algorithm to disaggregate end-use load profiles from premise-level data. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 4(2):42--47, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Reichle, M. Wagner, M. Khan, K. Geihs, M. Valla, C. Fra, N. Paspallis, and G. Papadopoulos. A context query language for pervasive computing environment. pages 434--440, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Spees and L. Lave. Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing. The Energy Journal, 29(2):101--122, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. U.S. Department of Energy. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning to be energy-wise: discriminative methods for load disaggregation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      e-Energy '12: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Future Energy Systems: Where Energy, Computing and Communication Meet
      May 2012
      250 pages
      ISBN:9781450310550
      DOI:10.1145/2208828

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader