Deborah G. Johnson
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Are designers responsible for all of the uses of the systems they create?
- 1 Abbott, A. The System of Professions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- 2 ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct adopted by ACM Council, October 16, 1992. Commun. A CM 36, 2 (Feb. 1993).Google Scholar
- 3 Bayles, M. Professional Ethics. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA, 1981.Google Scholar
- 4 Davis, M. Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs 20, 2 (Feb. 1992), 150-167.Google Scholar
- 5 Field, R.C. National forest planning is promoting U.S. forest service acceptance of operations research. Interfaces 14, 5 (Sept.-Oct. 1984), 67-76.Google Scholar
- 6 Freidson, E. Professional Powers. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
- 7 Goldman, A. The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, N.J., 1980.Google Scholar
- 8 Hart, H.L.A. and Honore, A.M. Causation in the Law. Oxford University Press, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
- 9 Johnson, D.G. Computer Ethics, 2d ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Johnson D.G. The Social Professional Responsibility of Engineers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 577 (1989), 106-114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 Keeney, R. L. Using values in operations research. TIMS/ORSA Joint National Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, April 25, 1994.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 Mulvey, J.M. Models in the public sector: Success, failure, and ethical behavior. Ethics in Modeling, W.A. Wallace, Ed. Elsevier, Tarrytown, N.Y., 1994.Google Scholar
- 13 Mulvey, J.M. Financial planning via multistage stochastic optimization. Ot~A J. of Computing. Forthcoming, 1996.Google Scholar
- 14 ORSA Ad Hoc Committee on Professional Standards. Guidelines for the practice of operations research. Operations Research 19, 5 (May 1971), 1123-1258.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Accountability and computer decision systems
Recommendations
Developing foundations for accountability systems: informational norms and context-sensitive judgments
GTIP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Governance of Technology, Information and PoliciesAdequately protecting informational privacy in an increasingly interconnected world poses two problems. What are the appropriate privacy polices? And, how should one ensure compliance with them?
Accountability systems are an attractive solution to both ...
Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support
In the course of interacting with a decision support system (DSS), decision makers may have numerous opportunities for exercising judgments. Some judgments pertain to what to do next; others require predictions or evaluations. Either deliberately or ...
Comments