skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145389acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing the structure of the emergent division of labor in multiparty collaboration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In our daily life, the interactive roles of leaders, followers, and coordinators tend to emerge from multiparty collaboration. The primary purpose of this study is to automatically predict the leading role in multiparty interaction by ubiquitous computing techniques. Even though the leading role has been predicted for an entire task, there has been little focus on evaluating how roles are reorganized during a task. To find the verbal and nonverbal cues that might predict roles, we asked neutral third parties to select the participant playing the leading role in an assembly task. We examined the correlation between behavioral data gathered during a task and third-party evaluations of the leading role player in terms of temporal alterations. The preliminary results suggest that task-oriented utterances and verification behaviors regarding progress status contribute to the prediction of the emerging and reorganized leader. Moreover, we discuss the implications of our findings for the design of applications that can enhance multiparty collaboration.

References

  1. L. Carter, W. Haytorn, B. Shriver, and J. Lanzetta. The behavior of leaders and other group members. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46:589--595, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. R. Forsyth. Group dynamics, fifth edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Jayagopi, S. Ba, J. Odobez, and D. Gatica-Perez. Predicting two facets of cosial verticality in meetings from five-minute time slices and nonverbal cues. In Proceedings of ICMI2008, pages 45--52, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Kato, T. Nishimori, and T. Mochizuki. A design of collaborative learning in terms of supporting emergent division of labor. In Proceedings of CELDA 2005, pages 309--316, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. C. Lozano and B. Tversky. Communicative gestures benefit communicators. In Proceedings of CogSci2004, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Matsuyama, H. Taniyama, S. Fujie, and T. Kobayashi. Framework of communication activation robot participating in multiparty conversation. In Proceedings of AAAI Fall symposium, dialog with robots, pages 68--73, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Otsuka, J. Yamato, Y. Takemae, and H. Murase. Quantifying interpersonal influence in face-to-face conversations based on visual attention patterns. In Proceedings of CHI2006, pages 1175--1179, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Suzuki, T. Kamiya, I. Umata, S. Ito, and S. Iwasawa. Verbal and nonverbal behaviors in group work: a case study of leadership through the assembling process. In Proceedings of ICCS2008, pages 262--265, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. Suzuki, T. Kamiya, I. Umata, S. Ito, and S. Iwasawa. Nonverbal behaviors in cooperative work: a case study of successful and unsuccessful team. In Proceedings of ICCS2010, pages 448--449, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing the structure of the emergent division of labor in multiparty collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader