Madeline E. Smith
Duyen T. Nguyen
Eric P.S. Baumer
ABSTRACT
For many first-year college students in their late teen years, communicating with parents provides crucial social support. When going to college involves moving away from home for the first time, students and their parents must rely on technologies to keep communication channels open. We studied the ways in which college freshmen communicate with their parents and the various communication technologies they use. Interviews with nineteen first-year students at a major United States university revealed insights into students' perspectives of their communication and relationships with parents. We found students to use a variety of tools to connect with their parents and identified some considerations they make when choosing tools. Furthermore, the use of these communication tools played a significant role in mediating students' social and emotional closeness with, and independence from, their parents. We conclude by discussing technical and social implications for social support of students and student-parent relationships.
- Aitken, N. D. 1982. College student performance, satisfaction and retention: specification and estimation of a structural model. J. of Higher Edu., 53(1), 32--50.Google Scholar
- Agosto, D. & Abbas, J. 2010. High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns. Proc. ASIS&T '10, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aoki, K. & Downes, E. J. 2003. An analysis of young people's use of and attitudes toward cell phones. Telematics and Informatics, 20(4), 349--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. 1993. Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. CACM, 36(1), 28--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- boyd, d. & Ellison, N. B. 2008. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. JCMC, 13(1), 210--230.Google Scholar
- Chen, Y. F & Katz, J. E. 2009. Extending family to school life: College students' use of the mobile phone. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 179--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimond, J., Poole, E. & Yardi, S. 2010. The effects of life disruptions on home technology routines. Proc. GROUP '10, 85--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. Proc. CHI '06, 541--550. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farnham, S. D. & Churchill, E. F. 2011. Faceted identity, faceted lives: Social and technical issues with being yourself online. Proc. CSCW '11, 359--368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Flanagan, C., Schulenberg, J. & Fuligni, A. 1993. Residential setting and parent-adolescent relationships during the college years. J. of Youth and Adolescence, 22(2), 171--189.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foth, M., & Hearn, G. 2007. Networked individualism of urban residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings. Info. Comm. & Society, 10(5), 749--772.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gentzler, A. L., Oberhauser, A. M., Westerman, D., & Nadorff, D. K. 2011. College Students' Use of Electronic Communication with Parents: Links to Loneliness, Attachment, and Relationship Quality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 71--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gordon, C. F., Juang, L. P. & Syed, M. 2007. Internet Use and Well-Being Among College Students: Beyond Frequency of Use. J. of College Student Dev., 48(6), 674--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Green, K. M. 2007. Understanding college students' and parents' perceptions of cell phone communication in family relationships: A grounded theory approach Doctoral Dissertation, U. Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Hofer, B. K. 2008. The electronic tether: Parental regulation, self-regulation, and the role of technology in college transitions. J. of the First-year Experience & Students in Transition, 20(2), 9--24.Google Scholar
- Hofer, B. K., & Moore, A. S. 2010. The iConnected parent: Staying close to your kids in college (and beyond) while letting them grow up. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Holmes, T. H. & Rahe, R. H. 1967. The social readjustment rating scale. J. of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, G. M., Staton, A. Q. & Jorgensen-Earp, C. R. 1995. An ecological perspective on the transition of new university freshmen. Comm. Edu., 44, 336--352.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Judge, T. K. & Neustaedter, C. 2010. Sharing conversation and sharing life: video conferencing in the home. Proc. CHI '10, 655--658. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larose, S. & Boivin, M. 1998. Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. J. of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 1--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Magdol, L. 2002. Is moving gendered? The effects of residential mobility on the psychological well-being of men and women. Sex Roles, 47(11), 553--560.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Murnan, C. A. 2006. Expanding communication mechanisms: they're not just e-mailing anymore. Proc. SIGUCCS '06, 267--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. 1997. Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MISQ, 21(2), 145--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Palffrey, J. & Gasser, U. 2010. Born digital: under-standing the first generation of digital natives. NY: Basic Books. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sax, L. J. & Wartman, K. L. 2010. Studying the impact of parental involvement on college student development: a review and agenda for research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 219--255.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, J. P. & Buboltz, W. C. 2004. The relationship between attachment to parents and psychological separation in college students. J. of College Student Dev., 45(5), 566--577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Mateas, M., & Gay, G. 2008. The disenchantment of affect. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 12(5), 347--358. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Cummings, J. 2008. Keeping in touch by technology: maintaining friendships after a residential move. Proc. CHI '08, 807--816. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tacchi, J., Slater, D., & Hearn, G. 2003. Ethnographic action research: a user's handbook. New Delhi: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Wintre, M. G. & Yaffe, M. 2000. First-year students' adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. J. of Adolescent Research, 15(1), 9--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wong-Villacres, M. & Bardzell, S. 2011. Technology-mediated parent-child intimacy: Designing for Ecuadorian families separated by migration. CHI Ext. Abst., 2215--2220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyche, S., Taylor, A., and Kaye, J. 2007. Pottering: a design-oriented investigation. Proc. CHI '07, 1895--1898. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yardi, S. & Bruckman, A. 2011. Social and technical challenged in parenting teens' social media use. Proc. CHI '11, 3238--3246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yarosh, S., Chew, Y. C. & Abowd, G. D. 2009. Supporting parent-child communication in divorced families. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 192--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Going to college and staying connected: communication between college freshmen and their parents
Recommendations
Characteristics of college cyberbullies
Cyberbullying is a newer variation of bullying that utilizes technology to harass. This study investigated the psychological symptomology, suicidal behaviors, aggressive tendencies, and illegal behaviors of college cyberbullies. Sixty cyberbullies and ...
WAKEY: Assisting Parent-child Communication for Better Morning Routines
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingParent-child communication is an essential element in behavioral and character development in early childhood; however, parents may find it difficult to be aware of how they talk to their children. Through extensive field studies with experts and ...
Alcohol-related sex expectancies explain the relation between alcohol use and sexting among college students
AbstractAlcohol use and sexual behavior are prevalent among college students. Sexting, defined as the sending and/or receiving of sexually explicit content via electronic methods, is also associated with college students’ alcohol use. Alcohol-...
Highlights- Nearly half reported sending a sext and two fifths reported requesting a sext.
- ...
Comments