skip to main content
10.1145/2070942.2070948acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hierarchical aggregate classification with limited supervision for data reduction in wireless sensor networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main challenge of designing classification algorithms for sensor networks is the lack of labeled sensory data, due to the high cost of manual labeling in the harsh locales where a sensor network is normally deployed. Moreover, delivering all the sensory data to the sink would cost enormous energy. Therefore, although some classification techniques can deal with limited label information, they cannot be directly applied to sensor networks since they are designed for centralized databases. To address these challenges, we propose a hierarchical aggregate classification (HAC) protocol which can reduce the amount of data sent by each node while achieving accurate classification in the face of insufficient label information. In this protocol, each sensor node locally makes cluster analysis and forwards only its decision to the parent node. The decisions are aggregated along the tree, and eventually the global agreement is achieved at the sink node. In addition, to control the tradeoff between the communication energy and the classification accuracy, we design an extended version of HAC, called the constrained hierarchical aggregate classification (cHAC) protocol. cHAC can achieve more accurate classification results compared with HAC, at the cost of more energy consumption. The advantages of our schemes are demonstrated through the experiments on not only synthetic data but also a real testbed.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

classification_1.mp4

mp4

146.1 MB

References

  1. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Han, M. Kamber, and J. Pei, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Cai, D. Ee, B. Pham, P. Roe, and J. Zhang, "Sensor network for the monitoring of ecosystem: Bird species recognition," in ISSNIP, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Hu, V. N. Tran, N. Bulusu, C. T. Chou, S. Jha, and A. Taylor, "The design and evaluation of a hybrid sensor network for cane-toad monitoring," in IPSN, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Duran, D. Peng, H. Sharif, B. Chen, and D. Armstrong, "Hierarchical character oriented wildlife species recognition through heterogeneous wireless sensor networks," in PIMRC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Gu, D. Jia, P. Vicaire, T. Yan, L. Luo, A. Tirumala, Q. Cao, T. He, J. A. Stankovic, T. Abdelzaher, and B. H. Krogh, "Lightweight detection and classification for wireless sensor networks in realistic environments," in SenSys, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Arora, P. Dutta, S. Bapat, V. Kulathumani, H. Zhang, V. Naik, V. Mittal, H. Cao, M. Demirbas, M. Gouda, Y. Choi, T. Herman, S. Kulkarni, U. Arumugam, M. Nesterenko, A. Vora, and M. Miyashita, "A line in the sand: A wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking," Computer Networks, vol. 46, pp. 605--634, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. R. Brooks, P. Ramanathan, and A. M. Sayeed, "Distributed target classification and tracking in sensor networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE, 2003, pp. 1163--1171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Mainwaring, D. Culler, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and J. Anderson, "Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring," in WSNA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Guo, P. Corke, G. Poulton, T. Wark, G. Bishop-Hurley, and D. Swain, "Animal behaviour understanding using wireless sensor networks," in LCN, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Sheng, Q. Li, W. Mao, and W. Jin, "Outlier detection in sensor networks," in MobiHoc, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. Cheng, J. Xu, J. Pei, and J. Liu, "Hierarchical distributed data classification in wireless sensor networks," in MASS, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. M. Tapia, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson, "Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors," in Pervasive, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Lorincz, B.-r. Chen, G. W. Challen, A. R. Chowdhury, S. Patel, P. Bonato, and M. Welsh, "Mercury: a wearable sensor network platform for high-fidelity motion analysis," in Sensys, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z. Zeng, S. Yu, W. Shin, and J. C. Hou, "PAS: A Wireless-Enabled, Cell-Phone-Incorporated Personal Assistant System for Independent and Assisted Living," in ICDCS, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. C. Barr and K. Asanovic, "Energy aware lossless data compression," in MobiSys, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Santini and K. Römer, "An adaptive strategy for quality-based data reduction in wireless sensor networks," in INSS, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. Römer, "Discovery of frequent distributed event patterns in sensor networks," in EWSN, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. L. Hill and D. E. Culler, "Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks," IEEE Micro, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 12--24, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Yang, L. Wang, D. K. Noh, H. K. Le, and T. F. Abdelzaher, "Solarstore: enhancing data reliability in solar-powered storage-centric sensor networks," in MobiSys, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Pon, M. A. Batalin, J. Gordon, A. Kansal, D. Liu, M. Rahimi, L. Shirachi, Y. Yu, M. Hansen, W. J. Kaiser, M. Srivastava, S. Gaurav, and D. Estrin, "Networked infomechanical systems: a mobile embedded networked sensor platform," in IPSN, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Girod, M. Lukac, V. Trifa, and D. Estrin, "The design and implementation of a self-calibrating distributed acoustic sensing platform," in SenSys, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J.-C. Chin, N. S. V. Rao, D. K. Y. Yau, M. Shankar, Y. Yang, J. C. Hou, S. Srivathsan, and S. Iyengar, "Identification of low-level point radioactive sources using a sensor network," ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, vol. 7, pp. 21:1--21:35, October 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. M. Michael, M. J. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, "Tag: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks," in OSDI, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. B. Krishnamachari, D. Estrin, and S. B. Wicker, "The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks," in ICDCSW, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. B. Yu, J. Li, and Y. Li, "Distributed data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks," in INFOCOM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. E. Anderson, A. S. Dave, and D. Margoliash, "Template-based automatic recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 1209--1219, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. P. Somervuo, A. Harma, and S. Fagerlund, "Parametric representations of bird sounds for automatic species recognition," Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, pp. 2252--2263, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Fagerlund, "Bird species recognition using support vector machines," EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., vol. 2007, pp. 64--64, January 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Cordina and C. J. Debono, "Maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks through intelligent clustering and data reduction techniques," in WCNC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. A. Lazarevic and Z. Obradovic, "The distributed boosting algorithm," in KDD, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. N. V. Chawla, L. O. Hall, K. W. Bowyer, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, "Learning ensembles from bites: A scalable and accurate approach," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 5, pp. 421--451, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. P. Luo, H. Xiong, K. Lü, and Z. Shi, "Distributed classification in peer-to-peer networks," in KDD, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. J. Gao, L. Guibas, N. Milosavljevic, and J. Hershberger, "Sparse data aggregation in sensor networks," in IPSN, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. L. Su, Y. Gao, Y. Yang, and G. Cao, "Towards optimal rate allocation for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks," in MobiHoc, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. D. L. Hall and J. Llinas, Handbook of multisensor data fusion. CRC Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. G. Xing, R. Tan, B. Liu, J. Wang, X. Jia, and C.-W. Yi, "Data fusion improves the coverage of wireless sensor networks," in MobiCom, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Gao, F. Liang, W. Fan, Y. Sun, and J. Han, "Graph-based consensus maximization among multiple supervised and unsupervised models," in NIPS, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. T. Dietterich, "Ensemble methods in machine learning," in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in CS, 1857. Springer, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hierarchical aggregate classification with limited supervision for data reduction in wireless sensor networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SenSys '11: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
          November 2011
          452 pages
          ISBN:9781450307185
          DOI:10.1145/2070942

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader