skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063777acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sparse structured probabilistic projections for factorized latent spaces

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Building a common representation for several related data sets is an important problem in multi-view learning. CCA and its extensions have shown that they are effective in finding the shared variation among all data sets. However, these models generally fail to exploit the common structure of the data when the views are with private information. Recently, methods explicitly modeling the information into shared part and private parts have been proposed, but they presume to know the prior knowledge about the latent space, which is usually impossible to obtain. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic model, which could simultaneously learn the structure of the latent space whilst factorize the information correctly, therefore the prior knowledge of the latent space is unnecessary. Furthermore, as a probabilistic model, our method is able to deal with missing data problem in a natural way. We show that our approach attains the performance of state-of-art methods on the task of human pose estimation when the motion capture view is completely missing, and significantly improves the inference accuracy with only a few observed data.

References

  1. C. Archambeau and F. Bach. Sparse probabilistic projections. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 21. MIT Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Bach and M. Jordan. A probabilistic interpretation of canonical correlation analysis. Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Ek, J. Rihan, P. Torr, G. Rogez, and N. Lawrence. Ambiguity modeling in latent spaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, pages 62--73. Springer-Verlag, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Ek, P. Torr, and N. Lawrence. Gaussian process latent variable models for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine learning for Multimodal Interaction, pages 132--143. Springer-Verlag, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Fan, W. G. Aref, A. K. Elmagarmid, M.-S. Hacid, M. S. Marzouk, and X. Zhu. Multiview: Multilevel video content representation and retrieval. J. Electronic Imaging.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Hardoon and J. Shawe-Taylor. Sparse canonical correlation analysis. Machine Learning, pages 1--23, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Jia, M. Salzmann, and T. Darrell. Factorized Latent Spaces with Structured Sparsity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 23. MIT Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Klami and S. Kaski. Probabilistic approach to detecting dependencies between data sets. Neurocomputing, 72(1--3):39--46, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Kuss and T. Graepel. The geometry of kernel canonical correlation analysis. Technical report, Max Planck Institution, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Lange, D. Hunter, and I. Yang. Optimization transfer using surrogate objective functions. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9(1):1--20, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Lawrence. Gaussian process latent variable models for visualisation of high dimensional data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 16, pages 329--336. MIT Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Leen. Context assisted information extraction. PhD thesis, Univerisyt of the West of Scotland,, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Navaratnam, A. Fitzgibbon, and R. Cipolla. The joint manifold model for semi-supervised multi-valued regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Salzmann, C. Ek, R. Urtasun, and T. Darrell. Factorized orthogonal latent spaces. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Shon, K. Grochow, A. Hertzmann, and R. Rao. Learning shared latent structure for image synthesis and robotic imitation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 18, pages 1233--1240. MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Sigal and M. Black. Humaneva: Synchronized video and motion capture dataset for evaluation of articulated human motion. Technical report, Brown Univertsity, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Sigal, R. Memisevic, and D. Fleet. Shared kernel information embedding for discriminative inference. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Tipping. Analysis of sparse Bayesian learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 383--390. MIT Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Tipping and C. Bishop. Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61(3):611--622, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
    October 2011
    2712 pages
    ISBN:9781450307178
    DOI:10.1145/2063576

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader