skip to main content
10.1145/1998570.1998575acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: the gradient case

Published:14 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bio-inspired mechanisms have been extensively used in the last decade for solving optimisation problems and for decentralised control of sensors, robots or nodes in P2P systems. Different attempts at describing some of these mechanisms have been proposed, some of them under the form of design patterns. However, there is not so far a clear catalogue of these mechanisms, described as patterns, showing the relations between the different patterns and identifying the precise boundaries of each mechanism. To ease engineering of artificial bio-inspired systems, this paper describes a group of bio-inspired mechanisms in terms of design patterns organised into different layers. This approach is exemplified through the description of 7 bio-inspired mechanisms: three basic ones (Spreading, Aggregation, and Evaporation), a mid-level one (Gradient) obtained by composing the basic ones, and three top-level ones (Chemotaxis, Morphogenesis, and Quorum sensing) exploiting the mid-level one.

References

  1. O. Babaoglu, G. Canright, A. Deutsch, G. A. D. Caro, F. Ducatelle, L. M. Gambardella, N. Ganguly, M. Jelasity, R. Montemanni, A. Montresor, and T. Urnes. Design patterns from biology for distributed computing. ACM TAAS, 1:26--66, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Beal. Flexible self-healing gradients. In SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing, pages 1197--1201. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Beal, J. Bachrach, D. Vickery, and M. Tobenkin. Fast self-healing gradients. In SAC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 1969--1975, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Bojinov, A. Casal, and T. Hogg. Multiagent control of self-reconfigurable robots, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Britton and L. Sack. The secoas project: development of a self-organising wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring. In 2nd International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications, Boston, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Chen and D. Kotz. Solar: A pervasive-computing infrastructure for context-aware mobile applications. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College Hanover, NH, USA 03755, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. De Wolf and T. Holvoet. Design patterns for decentralised coordination in self-organising emergent systems. Engineering Self-Organising Systems, 4335:28--49, Feb. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Deneubourg, J. Pasteels, and J. Verhaeghe. Probabilistic behaviour in ants: A strategy of errors? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 105(2):259 -- 271, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Dorigo. Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Dorigo and G. Di Caro. The ant colony optimization meta-heuristic. New Ideas in Optimization, pages 11--32, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. L. Fernandez-Marquez and J. L. Arcos. An evaporation mechanism for dynamic and noisy multimodal optimization. In Proc. of the Conference on Genetic and evolutionary Computation (GECCO'09), pages 17--24. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. L. Fernandez-Marquez and J. L. Arcos. Adapting particle swarm optimization in dynamic and noisy environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 765--772, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. L. Fernandez-Marquez, J. L. Arcos, G. Di Marzo Serugendo, and M. Casadei. Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: the gossip case. In Proc. of EASE'2011, pages 87--96. IEEE Computer Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Gardelli, M. Viroli, and A. Omicini. Design patterns for self-organizing multiagent systems. In Proceedings of EEDAS, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Mamei, R. Menezes, R. Tolksdorf, and F. Zambonelli. Case studies for self-organization in computer science. J. Syst. Archit, 52:433--460, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Mamei, M. Vasirani, and F. Zambonelli. Experiments of morphogenesis in swarms of simple mobile robots. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18:903--919, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Mamei and Zambonelli. Motion coordination in the quake 3 arena environment: a field-based approach. In First International Workshop on Environments for Multiagent Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. B. Miller and B. L. Bassler. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 55(1):165--199, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. Nagpal. A catalog of biologically-inspired primitives for engineering self-organization. engineering self-organising systems: Nature-inspired approaches to software engineering (2003); 2977: 53--62. In Engineering Self-Organising Systems, Nature-Inspired Approaches to Software Engineering. Volume 2977 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 53--62. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Parunak, M. Purcell, and R. Connell. Digital pheromones for auton. coordination of swarming uavs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. C. Radhika and R. Nagpal. Programmable self-assembly using biologically-inspired. pages 418--425. Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. M. Ruairí and M. T. Keane. An energy-efficient, multi-agent sensor network for detecting diffuse events. In IJCAI'07: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence, pages 1390--1395, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. Sahin and N. R. Franks. Measurement of space: From ants to robots. In Proceedings of WGW 2002: EPSRC/BBSRC International Workshop Biologically-Inspired Robotics, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Sudeikat and W. Renz. Toward systemic mas development: Enforcing decentralized self-organization by composition and refinement of archetype dynamics. In Proceedings of Engineering Environment-Mediated Multiagent Systems. Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Viroli, M. Casadei, S. Montagna, and F. Zambonelli. Spatial coordination of pervasive services through chemical-inspired tuple spaces. ACM Transac. on Autonomous and Adapt. Systems, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Weyns, T. Holvoet, and A. Helleboogh. Anticipatory vehicle routing using delegate multi-agent systems. pages 87 --93, sep. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Wolpert, T. Jessell, P. Lawrence, E. Meyerowitz, E. Robertson, and J. Smith. Principles of Development. Oxford Univer. Press, 3rd edition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: the gradient case

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        BADS '11: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Biologically inspired algorithms for distributed systems
        June 2011
        64 pages
        ISBN:9781450307338
        DOI:10.1145/1998570

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 June 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader