skip to main content
10.1145/1882992.1883120acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

A neuro-oncology workstation for structuring, modeling, and visualizing patient records

Published:11 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The patient medical record contains a wealth of information consisting of prior observations, interpretations, and interventions that need to be interpreted and applied towards decisions regarding current patient care. Given the time constraints and the large---often extraneous---amount of data available, clinicians are tasked with the challenge of performing a comprehensive review of how a disease progresses in individual patients. To facilitate this process, we demonstrate a neuro-oncology workstation that assists in structuring and visualizing medical data to promote an evidence-based approach for understanding a patient's record. The workstation consists of three components: 1) a structuring tool that incorporates natural language processing to assist with the extraction of problems, findings, and attributes for structuring observations, events, and inferences stated within medical reports; 2) a data modeling tool that provides a comprehensive and consistent representation of concepts for the disease-specific domain; and 3) a visual workbench for visualizing, navigating, and querying the structured data to enable retrieval of relevant portions of the patient record. We discuss this workstation in the context of reviewing cases of glioblastoma multiforme patients.

References

  1. Fletcher, R. H., O'Malley, M. S., Fletcher, S. W., Earp, J. A. and Alexander, J. P. Measuring the continuity and coordination of medical care in a system involving multiple providers. Med Care, 22, 5 (May 1984), 403--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Weed, L. L. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med, 278, 12 (Mar 21 1968), 652--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schroeter, A. and Meinzer, H. DICOM structured reporting. Radiographics, 24, 3 (2004), 897--909.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuhn, K., Gaus, W., Wechsler, J., Janowitz, P., Tudyka, J., Kratzer, W., Swobodnik, W. and Ditschuneit, H. Structured reporting of medical findings: evaluation of a system in gastroenterology. Methods Inf Med, 31, 4 (1992), 268--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Weir, C., Hurdle, J., Felgar, M., Hoffman, J., Roth, B. and Nebeker, J. Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. Methods Inf Med, 42, 1 (2003), 61--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedman, C. and Hripcsak, G. Natural language processing and its future in medicine. Acad Med, 74, 8 (1999), 890--895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ogunyemi, O. Methods for reasoning from geometry about anatomic structures injured by penetrating trauma. J Biomed Inform, 39, 4 (2006), 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zhou, L. and Hripcsak, G. Temporal reasoning with medical data--a review with emphasis on medical natural language processing. J Biomed Inform, 40, 2 (2007), 183--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S. and Shneiderman, B. LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. ACM New York, NY, USA, City, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Harkema, H., Dowling, J., Thornblade, T. and Chapman, W. ConText: An algorithm for determining negation, experiencer, and temporal status from clinical reports. J Biomed Inform, 42, 5 (2009), 839--851. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pearl, J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge Univ Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Taira, R., Bashyam, V. and Kangarloo, H. A field theoretical approach to medical natural language processing. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 11, 4 (2007), 364--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Blei, D., Ng, A. and Jordan, M. Latent dirichlet allocation. JMLR, 3(2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A neuro-oncology workstation for structuring, modeling, and visualizing patient records

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHI '10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
          November 2010
          886 pages
          ISBN:9781450300308
          DOI:10.1145/1882992

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 November 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • demonstration

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader