skip to main content
10.1145/1864349.1864376acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: implications for energy sensing and feedback

Published:26 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy use in the home is a topic of increasing interest and concern, and one on which technology can have a significant impact. However, existing work typically focuses on moderately affluent homeowners who have relative autonomy with respect to their home, or does not address socio-economic status, class, and other related issues. For the 30% of the U.S. population who rent their homes, many key decisions regarding energy use must be negotiated with a landlord. Because energy use impacts the bottom line of both landlords and tenants, this can be a source of conflict in the landlord/tenant relationship. Ubicomp technologies for reducing energy use in rental units must engage with landlord/tenant conflicts to be successful. Unfortunately, little detailed knowledge is available about the impact of landlord/tenant conflicts on energy use. We present an analysis of a series of qualitative studies with landlords and tenants. We argue that a consideration of multiple stakeholders, and the power imbalances among them, will drive important new research questions and lead to more widely applicable solutions. The main contribution of our work is a set of open research questions and design recommendations for technologies that may affect and be affected by the conflict between stakeholders around energy use.

References

  1. }}Abrahamse, W., Wokje, A., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. of Env. Psychology 25(3): 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. }}Belsky, E., Drew, R. (2007). Taking Stock of the Nation's Rental Housing Challenges and a Half Century of Public Policy Responses. Revisiting Rental Housing: A National Policy Summit, November 2006. As of 6/28/2010: http://www.cltnetwork.org/doc_library/p4-2009%20Harvard%20Study%20State%20of%20Housing.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. }}Bødker, S. Scenarios in user-centred design - setting the stage for reflection and action. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. }}Chetty, M., Tran, D., & Grinter, R. (2008). Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home, In Proc. Ubicomp '08. 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. }}Clark-IbáÑez, M. (2004). Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12):1507--1527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. }}Current Housing Reports. (2008). American housing survey for the United States: 2007. As of 9/12/09: http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/h150-07.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. }}Cohen, G., Gupta, S., Froehlich, J., Larson, E. & Patel, S. (2010). GasSense: Appliance-level, single-point sensing of gas activity in the home. Proc. Pervasive '10, To Appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. }}Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E, & Fussell, S. (2009). It's Not all about green: Energy use in low-income communities. In Proc Ubicomp '09, 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. }}Disalvo, C., Nourbakhsh, D. Akin, & M. Louw. (2008). The neighborhood networks project: A case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. }}Dourish, P. Print this paper, kill a tree: Environmental sustainability research topic of HCI. LUCI-2009-004, University of California, Irvine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. }}1Ekstrom, M., & Danermark, B. (1991). The study of power mechanisms - An interactive and generative approach to a case study of Swedish urban renewal. Housing, Theory and Society, 8:3, 153--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. }}Fischer, C. Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? (2008). Energy Efficiency 1, 79--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. }}Foucault, M. (1994). Governmentality. In P. Rabinow (Series Ed.) and J.D. Faubion (Vol Ed.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984: Volume 3. Michel Foucault: Power (pp. 201--222). New York: New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. }}Foucault, M. (1980). Power in the writings of Talcott Parson, in A. Giddens Politics, Sociology and Social Theory. Encounters with Classical and Contemporary Social Thought, pp. 199--215. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. }}Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., & Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc CHI, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. }}Froehlich, J., Larson, E., Campbell, T., Haggerty, C., Fogarty, J., & Patel, S. (2009). HydroSense: infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity. In Proc of Ubicomp. 235--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. }}Galbraith, J.(1983). The Anatomy of Power, Houghton Mifflin Company Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. }}Gerber, B., Stolley, M., Thompson, A., Sharp, L., & Fitzgibbon, M. (2009). Mobile phone text messaging to promote healthy behaviors and weight loss maintenance: a feasibility study. Health Informatics Journal 15(1):17--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. }}Giddens, A. (1995). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies, Hutchinson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. }}Gilderbloom, J.I. (1989). Sociological influences on rentals for US urban housing. Amer. J. of Eco. and Soc., 48:273--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. }}Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. }}Horowitz, D., Kamvar, S.D. (2010). The Anatomy of Large-Scale Social Search Engine. In Proc of WWW, To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. }}Keller, S. (1988). Does the roof have to cave in? The landlord/tenant power relationship and the intentional infliction of emotional distress, Cardozo Law. Rev. 9:1663--1698.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. }}Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. }}McArdle, M. (2009). Weathering the storm: The current state of low-Income renters. National Urban League, Policy Institute. As of 12/19/09: http://www.nul.org/content/weathering-storm-current-state-low-income-renter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. }}Overdest, C. & Mayer, B. (2008) Harnessing the power of information through community monitoring: Insights from social science, Texas Law Review 16:1493--1526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. }}Parsons, T. (1960). The distribution of power in American society, in T. Parsons Structure and Process in Modern Societies, 199--225. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. }}Patel, S.N., Robertson, T., Kientz, J.A., Reynolds, M.S., & Abowd, G.D. (2007). At the flick of a switch: detecting and classifying unique electrical events on the residential power line. In Pro of Ubicomp '07, 271--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. }}Paulos, E., Honicky, R., & Hooker, B.(2008). Citizen science: enabling participatory urbanism. In Foth, M.(ed), Urban Informatics:Community Integration and Implementation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. }}Pierce, J., Schiano, D., & Paulos, E. (2010). Home, habits, and energy: deconstructing domestic interactions and energy consumptions. In Proc. of CHI '10, To Appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. }}Popplestone, G. (1972). Collective action among private tenants. British Journal of Social Work,2(3):369--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. }}Strengers, Y. (2008). Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households. In Proc. OZCHI '08, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. }}U.S. Census 2006 Economic Survey (2007). Income data. Viewed 04/17/2009 http://pubdb3.census.gov/ macro/032007/hhinc/new06000.ht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. }}Vaughan, T. (1968). The landlord-tenant relation in a low-income area. Social Problems, 16(2):208--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. }}Vieweg, S., Palen, L., Liu, S. Hughes, A., & Sutton, J. (2008). Collective intelligence in disaster: An examination of the phenomenon in the aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting. In Proc of ISCRAM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. }}Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. An outline of interpretative sociology, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of CA Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. }}Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., & Augustin, S. (2008). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proc. CHI '08, 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: implications for energy sensing and feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '10: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing
      September 2010
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781605588438
      DOI:10.1145/1864349

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 September 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '10 Paper Acceptance Rate39of202submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader