skip to main content
10.1145/1551788.1551791acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EduWear: smart textiles as ways of relating computing technology to everyday life

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we report on the outcomes of the European project EduWear. The aim of the project was to develop a construction kit with smart textiles and to examine its impact on young people. The construction kit, including a suitable programming environment and a workshop concept, was adopted by children in a number of workshops.

The evaluation of the workshops showed that designing, creating, and programming wearables with a smart textile construction kit allows for creating personal meaningful projects which relate strongly to aspects of young people's life worlds. Through their construction activities, participants became more self-confident in dealing with technology and were able to draw relations between their own creations and technologies present in their environment. We argue that incorporating such constructionist processes into an appropriate workshop concept is essential for triggering thought processes about the character of digital media beyond the construction process itself.

References

  1. Ackermann, E. Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In L. Tokoro M.; Steels (Ed.), A learning zone of one's own: Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 15--37.). Amsterdam, Berlin. Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arduino Homepage: http://www.arduino.cc (11/01/2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Begel, A. LogoBlocks: A graphical programming language for interacting with the world. Advanced undergraduate project. MIT Boston, MA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglin, L. 2005. Spookies: combining smart materials and information technology in an interactive toy. In Proceedings of IDC'05 (Boulder, Colorado, June 08-10, 2005). ACM, New York, NY, 17--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buechley, L., Elumeze, N. & Eisenberg, M. Electronic/computational textiles and children's crafts. In Proceedings of IDC'06 (Tampere, Finland, June 07-09, 2006). ACM, New York, NY, 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J. & Crockett, A. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05-10, 2008). CHI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Butler, D.; Strohecker, C. & Martin, F. Sustaining Local Identity, Control and Ownership While Integrating Technology into School Learning. In Proc. ISSEP, Springer, 2006, 4226, 255--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Charmaz, K. & Bryant, A. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Sage Publications: London/Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cricket Home Page: http://handyboard.com/cricket/ (11/01/2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittert, N., Dittmann, K., Grüter, T., Kümmel, A., Osterloh, A., Reichel, A., Schelhowe, H., Volkmann, G. & Zorn, I. Understanding Digital Media by constructing intelligent artefacts. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA'07 (Vienna 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fashioning Technology ("a 'smart' crafting community")- Website http://www.fashioningtech.com/ (11/01/2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kafai, Y. B., and Resnick, M. Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleining, G. & Witt, H. The qualitative heuristic approach: A methodology for discovery in psychology and the social sciences. Rediscovering the method of introspection as an example. In Forum: Qualitative Social Research (On-line Journal), 1(1), 2000. Available at: http://qualitative-research.net/fqs (17/6/2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuhn, S. Learning from the architecture studio: Implications for project-based pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 & 5) (2001), 349--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. LEGO Mindstorms: http://mindstorms.lego.com (11/01/2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellis, D., Banzi, M., Cuartielles, D., & Igoe, T. Arduino: An open electronics prototyping platform. alt.chi section of the CHI 2007 conference in San Jose (CA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Müllerburg, M., Petersen, U. & Theidig, G.: Mit Robotern spielend lernen, In VDI (Ed.) ROBOTIK 2004. VDI Report Nr. 1841, S.393--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Papert, S. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Papert, S. A critique of Technocentrism in thinking about the School of the Future. In M.I.T. Media Lab Epistemology and Learning Memo No. 2, Sept. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. PicoCricket Homepage: http://www.picocricket.com/ (11/01/2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Reichel, M. & Wiesner-Steiner, A. Gender Inscriptions in Robotic Courses. In Proceedings of ICDML'06, Tana Press, 61--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reichel, M., Osterloh, A., Katterfeldt, E., Butler, D. & Schelhowe, H. EduWear: Designing smart textiles for playful learning. In Readings in Technology in Education: Proceedings of ICICTE'08, Corfu, Greece, July 2008 (pp.252--263).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Resnick, M. StarLogo: an environment for decentralized modeling and decentralized thinking. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April 13-18, 1996). M. J. Tauber, Ed. CHI'96. ACM, New York, NY, 11--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Resnick, M. & Silverman, B. Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. In Proceedings of IDC'05 (Boulder, Colorado, June 08-10, 2005). ACM, New York, NY, 117--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EduWear: smart textiles as ways of relating computing technology to everyday life

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IDC '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
          June 2009
          347 pages
          ISBN:9781605583952
          DOI:10.1145/1551788

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 June 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader