skip to main content
10.1145/1463160.1463165acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

OPOS: an observation scheme for evaluating head-up play

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The concept of Head-Up Games [18] advocates that pervasive games of the future should be designed to evoke play patterns akin to those of traditional outdoor games. This tenet, while appealing, is ill defined without a clear description of these behaviors. Below we introduce OPOS, an observation scheme that can be used to evaluate Head-Up Games and, more generally, outdoor pervasive games intended for children. The observation scheme has been evaluated through its application in observing play with traditional outdoor games and a purpose made Head-Up Game. The study involved 24 children of 10--11 years old; it was found that the proposed observation scheme is objective and reliable, helping evaluators compare pervasive games regarding the play behaviors they provoke.

References

  1. Andel, J. van. 1985. Woonomgeving en Kinderen; een onderzoek naar de invloed van ruimtelijke kenmerken en veranderingen van de woonomgeving op kinderen van 6 tot 12 jaar. Doctoral Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benford, S., Rowland, D., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Hull, R., Reid, J., Morrison, J., and Facer, K. 2005. Life on the Edge: Supporting Collaboration in Location-Based Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA, April 2--7, 2005). CHI '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 721--730. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Casey, S., Kirman, B., and Rowland, D. 2007. The Gopher Game: A Social, Mobile, Locative Game with User Generated Content and Peer Review. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Salzburg, Austria, June 13--15, 2007). ACE'07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 9--16. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1255047.1255050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fischer, J. E, Lindt, I., and Stenros, J. 2007. Evaluation of Crossmedia Gaming Experiences in Epidemic Menace. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Gaming Applications (Salzburg, Austria, June 11--12, 2007) PerGames 2007. 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanna, L., Neapolitan, D. and Risden, K. 2004. Evaluating computer game concepts with children. In Proceedings of the 3rd SIGCHI International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Maryland, USA, June 1--3, 2004) IDC '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 49--56. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1017833.1017840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harris, E., Fitzpatrick, G., Rogers, Y., Price, S., Phelps, T., and Randell, C. 2004. From Snark to Park: Lessons Learnt moving pervasive experiences from indoors to outdoors. In Proceedings of the 5th Australasian User Interface Conference (Dunedin, New Zealand, January 18--22, 2004) AUIC '04. 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Henniger M. L. 1980. Free-Play Behaviours of Nursery School Children in an Indoor and Outdoor Environment. In Wilkinson, P. F., Ed., In Celebration of Play: An Integrated Approach to Play and Child Development. Croom Helm Ltd, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jansen, R. G., Wiertz, L. F., Meyer, E. S., and Noldus, L. P. J. J. 2003. Reliability analysis of observational data: Problems, solutions, and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 3 (2003), 391--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Krasnor, L. R. and Pepler, D. J. 1980. The study of Children's Play: Some Suggested Future Directions. In Rubin, K. H., Ed., Children's Play: New Directions for Child Development. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Magerkurth, C., Cheok, A. D., Mandryk, R. L. and Nilsen, T. 2005. Pervasive games: bringing computer entertainment back to the real world. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3, 3 (July 2005), ACM press, New York. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1077246.1077257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Markopoulos, P., Read, J. C., Hoysniemi, J., MacFarlane, S., 2008. Evaluating Children's Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers. Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mattila. J., and Väätänen, A. 2006. UbiPlay: An Interactive Playground and Visual Programming Tools for Children. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGCHI International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Tampere, Finland, June 7--9, 2006) IDC '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 129- 136. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1139073.1139106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Metin, P. 2003. The effects of traditional playground equipment design in children's developmental needs. Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Peitz, J., Saarenpää, H, and Björk, S. 2007. Insectopia - Exploring Pervasive Games through Technology already Pervasively Available. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Salzburg, Austria, June 13--15, 2007). ACE'07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 107--114. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1255047.1255069. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Price, S., Rogers, S., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., and Neale, H. 2003. Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning, Interacting with Computers, 15, 2, Interaction Design and Children (April 2003), 169--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rubin, K. H. 2001. The Play Observation Scale (POS). Published by the Center for Children, Relationships, and Culture of the University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.rubin-lab.umd.edu/Coding%20Schemes/, last accessed 20-04-2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Siegel, S., and Castellan, H. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Soute, I. and Markopoulos, P. 2007. Head Up Games: The Games of the Future Will Look More Like the Games of the Past. In C Baranaukas et al., Ed., INTERACT 2007, LNCS 4663, Part II, 404--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Verhaegh, J., Soute, I., Kessels, S., and Markoploulos, P. 2006. On the design of Camelot, an outdoor game for children. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGCHI International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Tampere, Finland, June 7--9, 2006) IDC '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zuckerman, O., Pares, N., Benford, S., and Lund, H. H. 2006. Designing Interactive Environments for Outdoors Gaming and Play. SIG at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22--27, 2006). CHI '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 419--422. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125451.1125542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. OPOS: an observation scheme for evaluating head-up play

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges
              October 2008
              621 pages
              ISBN:9781595937049
              DOI:10.1145/1463160

              Copyright © 2008 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 October 2008

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader