skip to main content
10.1145/1459359.1459567acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

A learner, is a learner, is a user, is a customer: QoS-based experience-aware adaptation

Published:26 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an outline of the doctoral thesis work concerning adaptation policies towards quality of experience (QoE) in performance-aware adaptive multimedia e-learning systems. QoE is considered to be mainly affected by the psychological concept of flow and learning-related factors. In turn, for multimedia systems, these factors can be heavily influenced by quality of service (QoS). In an ideal world, QoS would not be an issue and content optimally tailored to a user's needs could always be perfectly delivered. Unfortunately, delivery conditions are not always ideal, and it may be infeasible to deliver certain multimedia content such as high quality video while maintaining an acceptable QoS. The goal of this research is to balance the constraints imposed by QoS restrictions with the requirements of flow and learning in order to produce the highest possible QoE for the learner using an adaptive multimedia system.

References

  1. Graf, S., Lin, T., Jeffrey, L., Kinshuk 2006. An Explanatory Study of the Relationship Between Learning Styles and Cognitive Traits. In EC-TEL 2006, LNCS, Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K., Eds. vol. 4227, pp. 470--475. Springer, Heidelberg Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Novak, T., Hoffmann, D., Yung, Y.-F. 2000. Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. In Marketing Science, Volume 19 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Moebs, S., McManis, J., "A Learner, is a Learner, is a User, is a Customer - So what exactly do you mean by Quality of Experience?" In Proceedings AH 2008 Workshop Technologies for Mobile and Wireless Adaptive Elearning Environments, 2008, in pressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Siller, M., Woods, J. 2006. Using an agent based platform to map quality of service to experience in conventional and active networks. In IEE Proceedings Communications, vol. 153, n6, pp.828--840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper PerennialGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Novak, T. P, Hoffman, D. L. 1997. Measuring the flow experience among Web users. Interval Research Corporation. Retrieved at 01 June 2008 from http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Skadberg, Y. X., Kimmel, J. R. 2004. Visitors' flow experience while browsing a Web site: its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. In Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 20, pp. 403--422, Elsevier, NetherlandsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. De Marez, L., de Moor, K. 2007. The Challenge of User- and QoE-centric Research and Product Development in Today's ICT-Environment. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 3, 1--22Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayer, R. E. 2003. The Promise of Multimedia Learning: Using the Same Instructional Design Methods Across Different Media. In Learning and Instruction 13, pp. 125--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghinea, G. Magoulas, G. D. Siamitros, C. 2005. Multicriteria decision making for enhanced perception-based multimedia communication. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, vol. 35, 6 pp. 855--866. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2005.851281 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Halasz, F. G., Schwartz, M. 1990. The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. In Communications of ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. De Bra, P., Houben, G.-J., Wu, H. 1999. AHAM: a Dexter-based reference model for adaptive hypermedia. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pp. 147--156. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Koch, N., Wirsing, M. 2002. The Munich Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia Applications. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, LNCS 2347, pp. 213--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Houben, G.-J., Aroyo, L., De Bra, P., Dicheva, D. 2005. Adaptation Engineering in Adaptive Concept-based Systems. In Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems, In Chen, S. Y., Magoulas, G. D. Eds. IRM PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Turoff, M., Linstone, H. A. 2002. The Delphi Method - Techniques and Applications. Retrieved March 29, 2006 from http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen, T. C., et al. 2003. A Practical Guide to Experience-Sampling Procedures. In Journal of Happiness Studies, pp. 53--78. Springer, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A learner, is a learner, is a user, is a customer: QoS-based experience-aware adaptation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '08: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia
          October 2008
          1206 pages
          ISBN:9781605583037
          DOI:10.1145/1459359

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 October 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • technical-note

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader