Mihaela Sabin
ABSTRACT
Information Technology (IT) curricula's strong application component and its focus on user centeredness and team work require that students experience directly real-world projects for real users of IT solutions. Although the merit of this IT educational tenet is universally recognized, delivering collaborative and experiential learning has its challenges.
Reaching out to identify projects formulated by actual organizations adds significantly to course preparation. There is a certain level of risk involved with delivering a useful solution while, at the same time, enough room should be allowed for students to experiment with, be wrong about, review, and learn. Challenges pertaining to the real-world aspect of problem-based learning are compounded by managing student teams and assessing their work such that both individual and collective contributions are taken into account. Finally, the quality of the project releases is not the only measure of student learning. Students should be given meaningful opportunities to practice, improve, and demonstrate their communication and interpersonal skills.
In this paper we present our experience with two courses in which teams of students worked on real-world projects involving three external partners. We describe how each of the challenges listed above has impacted the course requirements, class instruction, team dynamics, assessment, and learning in these courses. Course assessment and survey data from students are linked to learning outcomes and point to areas where the collaborative and experiential learning model needs improvement.
- Anthony, W. S. 1973. Learning to discover rules by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 3 (June 1973), 325--328.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Judith, W. C., Bair, B., Borstler, J., Lethbridge, T. C., and Surendran, K. 2003. Client sponsored projects in software engineering courses. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35, 1, 401--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R. M. 1980. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. 1961. The art of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 1, 21--32.Google Scholar
- Clark, N. 2005. Evaluating student teams developing unique industry projects. In Proceedings of the 7th Australian Computing Education Conference (Newcastle, Australia, 2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, N., Davies, P., and Skeers, R. 2005. Self and Peer Assessment in Software Engineering Projects. In Proceedings of the 7th Australian Computing Education Conference (Newcastle, Australia, 2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fenwick Jr., J. B. and Kurtz, B. 2005. Intra-curriculum software engineering education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37, 1, 540--544. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gorka, S., Miller, J. R., and Howe, B. J. 2007. Developing Realistic Capstone Projects in Conjunction with Industry. In Proceedings of the SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (Destin, FL, USA., October 2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grisham, P. S., Krasner, H., and Perry, D. E. 2006. Data engineering education with real-world projects. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38, 2, 64--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joint Task Force on IT Computing Curricula. 2008. Computing Curricula Information Technology Volume. Retrieved June 26, 2008 from http://campus.acm.org/public/comments/it-curriculum-draft-may-2008.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Jonassen, D. 1991. Objectivism versus constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 3, 5--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, P. K., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, 75--86.Google Scholar
- LeJeune, N. 2006. Assessment of individuals on CS group projects. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leidig, P. M., Ferguson, R., and Leidig, J. 2006. The Use of Community-Based Non-Profit Organizations in Information Systems Capstone Projects." ACM SIGCSE Bulleting, 38, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayer, R. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided-methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 1, 14--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papert, S. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schmidt, H.G. 1983. Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 1, 11--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smarkusky, D., Dempsey, R., Ludka, J., and Quillettes, F. 2005. Enhancing team knowledge: instruction vs. experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37, 1, 460--464. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, III, H. H. and Smarkusky, D. 2005. Competency Matrices for Peer Assessment of Individuals in Team Projects. In Proceedings of the SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (Newark, NJ, USA, 2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steffe, L. and Gale, J. 1995. Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychologist, 76, 347--376.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J. 2003. Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, B. Ross, Ed. Academic, San Diego, CA, 43, 215--266.Google Scholar
- Tan, J. and Phillips, J. 2005. Real-world project management in the academic environment. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20, 5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walvoord, B. E. and Anderson. 1998. V. J. Effective Grading: A tool for learning and assessment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A collaborative and experiential learning model powered by real-world projects
Recommendations
Improving Inquiry-Driven Modeling in Science Education through Interaction with Intelligent Tutoring Agents
IUI '15: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User InterfacesThis paper presents the design and evaluation of a set of intelligent tutoring agents constructed to teach teams of students an authentic process of inquiry-driven modeling. The paper first presents the theoretical grounding for inquiry-driven modeling ...
A Study on the "Ladder" Interactive Teaching Model of the Course of "Purchasing Practice" Based on Systematic Work Process
ICIET 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Education TechnologyBased on the systematic teaching mode of work process, this paper analyzes and studies the characteristics of classroom teaching, blended learning and network teaching, and it also demonstrates the hypothesis that traditional teaching methods are ...
Creativity in technology-enhanced experiential learning: videocast implementation in higher education
In recent years scholars have devoted significant resources to research how the learning process can be improved. Developments in information and communication technologies have also enabled the learning experience to expand beyond traditional settings ...
Comments