skip to main content
10.1145/1414004.1414072acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A defect-driven process for software quality improvement

Published:09 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software quality improvement initiatives are frequently attempted inside major software development companies. These initiatives often face difficulty motivating managers and developers. Yet the success of these improvement initiatives is directly related to receiving support from them. A defect-driven improvement process is proposed, aiming to improve the adoption of techniques by these key groups. The process is based on using defect data to identify issues in the current development process. ABB has used this process to focus and motivate change in three major development organizations around the world. Results show that this process yields measurable improvements in organizations that have been reluctant to change in the past.

References

  1. Baddoo, N. and Hall, T. 2003. De-motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners' views. J. Syst. Softw. 66, 1 (Apr. 2003), 23--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beizer, B. 1990. Software Testing Techniques (2nd Ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Berling, T. and Thelin, T. 2003. An Industrial Case Study of the Verification and Validation Activities. Int. Symp. on Software Metrics. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 226--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Card, D. N. 1998. Learning from Our Mistakes with Defect Causal Analysis. IEEE Softw. 15, 1 (Jan. 1998), 56--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I. S., Chaar, J. K., Halliday, M. J., Moebus, D. S., Ray, B. K., and Wong, M. 1992. Orthogonal Defect Classification-A Concept for In-Process Measurements. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18, 11 (Nov. 1992), 943--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. IEEE. IEEE standard classification for software anomalies. IEEE Std 1044--1993. 2 Jun 1994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, C. 1991 Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kaner, C., Falk, J. and Nguyen, H. Q. 1993. Testing Computer Software (2nd Ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leszak, M., Perry, D. E., and Stoll, D. 2000. A case study in root cause defect analysis. Int. Conf. on Softw. Eng. ACM Press, New York, NY, 428--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ostrand, T. J. and Weyuker, E. J. 1984. Collecting and categorizing software error data in an industrial environment. J. Syst. Softw. 4, 4 (Nov. 1984), 289--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A defect-driven process for software quality improvement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ESEM '08: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
        October 2008
        374 pages
        ISBN:9781595939715
        DOI:10.1145/1414004
        • General Chair:
        • Dieter Rombach,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Sebastian Elbaum,
        • Jürgen Münch

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 October 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader