skip to main content
10.1145/1411759.1411778acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotmobileConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The obscure nature of epidemic quorum systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Epidemic quorum systems enable highly available agreement even when a quorum is not simultaneously connected, and are therefore very interesting for mobile networks. Although recent work has proposed epidemic quorum algorithms, their properties and trade-offs are not well studied. This paper sheds some light on less known aspects of epidemic quorum systems. With simple counter-examples and combinatorial exercises, we contradict common misbeliefs that are often associated with epidemic quorum systems. Our claims advocate the need for a deeper study of these promising systems.

References

  1. Y. Amir and A. Wool. Evaluating quorum systems over the internet. In Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pages 26--35, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Barreto and P. Ferreira. The availability and performance of epidemic quorum algorithms. Technical Report 10/2007, INESC-ID, February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. I.-R. Chen and D.-C. Wang. Analyzing dynamic voting using petri nets. In SRDS '96: Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS '96), page 44, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. K. Gifford. Weighted voting for replicated data. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Operating System Principles SOSP 7, pages 150--162, Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove CA, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Holliday, R. Steinke, D. Agrawal, and A. E. Abbadi. Epidemic algorithms for replicated databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(5):1218--1238, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Ingols and I. Keidar. Availability study of dynamic voting algorithms. In ICDCS '01: Proceedings of the The 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, page 247, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Jajodia and D. Mutchler. Dynamic voting algorithms for maintaining the consistency of a replicated database. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 15(2):230--280, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. P. Junqueira and K. Marzullo. Coterie availability in sites. In P. Fraigniaud, editor, 19th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC), volume 3724 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 3--17. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Keleher. Decentralized replicated-object protocols. In Proc. of the 18th Annual ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC'99), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Levy and A. Silberschatz. Distributed file systems: Concepts and examples. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(4):321--374, Dec. 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Peleg and A. Wool. The availability of quorum systems. Information and Computation, 123(2):210--223, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The obscure nature of epidemic quorum systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HotMobile '08: Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Mobile computing systems and applications
          February 2008
          106 pages
          ISBN:9781605581187
          DOI:10.1145/1411759

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 February 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate96of345submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader