skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329213acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploiting factored representations for decentralized execution in multiagent teams

Published:14 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many cooperative multiagent domains, there exist some states in which the agents can act independently and others in which they need to coordinate with their teammates. In this paper, we explore how factored representations of state can be used to generate factored policies that can, with minimal communication, be executed distributedly by a multiagent team. The factored policies indicate those portions of the state where no coordination is necessary, automatically alert the agents when they reach a state in which they do need to coordinate, and determine what the agents should communicate in order to achieve this coordination. We evaluate the success of our approach experimentally by comparing the amount of communication needed by a team executing a factored policy to a team that needs to communicate in every timestep.

References

  1. D. S. Bernstein, R. Given, N. Immerman, and S. Zilberstein. The complexity of centralized control of Markov decision processes. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Boutilier, R. Dearden, and M. Goldszmidt. Stochastic dynamic programming with factored representations. Artificial Intelligence, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Boutilier, N. Friedman, M. Goldszmidt, and D. Koller. Context-specific independence in Bayesian networks. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Dean and K. Kanazawa. A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence Journal, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. V. Goldman and S. Zilberstein. Optimizing information exchange in cooperative multi-agent systems. In International Joint Conferences on Autonomous Agents and multi-Agent Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. V. Goldman and S. Zilberstein. Decentralized control of cooperative systems: Categorization and complexity analysis. Journal of AI Research, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Guestrin and G. Gordon. Distributed planning in hierarchical factored MDPs. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Guestrin, S. Venkataraman, and D. Koller. Context specific multiagent coordination and planning with factored MDPs. In AAAI Spring Symposium, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. Hansen and Z. Feng. Dynamic programming for POMDPs using a factored state representation. In International Conference on AI Planning Systems, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Hoey, R. St-Aubin, A. Hu, and C. Boutilier. SPUDD: Stochastic planning using decision diagrams. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Nair, M. Roth, M. Yokoo, and M. Tambe. Communication for improving policy computation in distributed POMDPs. In International Joint Conferences on Autonomous Agents and multi-Agent Systems, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. V. Pynadath and M. Tambe. The communicative Multiagent Team Decision Problem: Analyzing teamwork theories and models. Journal of AI Research, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Roth, R. Simmons, and M. Veloso. Reasoning about joint beliefs for execution-time communication decisions. In International Joint Conferences on Autonomous Agents and multi-Agent Systems, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploiting factored representations for decentralized execution in multiagent teams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
      May 2007
      1585 pages
      ISBN:9788190426275
      DOI:10.1145/1329125

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 May 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader