skip to main content
10.1145/1328057.1328105acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Taking e-government to the bottom of the pyramid: dial-a-gov?

Published:10 December 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much attention has been paid to the use of ICTs to improve the delivery of government services to citizens in developing countries. Government and donor funds have adopted two strategies in parallel: (i) the re-engineering and automating of government services, and (ii) the installation of telecenters (community Internet access centers) for citizens to access reengineered government "e-Gov" services.

The model of delivering e-Gov via the Internet has major drawbacks as shown by survey data representing 397 million people at the Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) in India, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand. First, only 49% have even heard of the Internet and only 2.6% have used it [15]. Second, it will take a lot more time and significant funds to roll-out enough telecenters to cover the BOP sufficiently. Third, most telecenters fail, while the successful ones are sustained by revenues from non-Internet services such as voice calls, fax and photocopying. But even these revenue streams may dwindle - according to our survey, over 40% of current BOP non-owners plan to purchase a phone within 2 years. They will spend their already-limited communications budgets on phones they own, not at a telecenter.

By viewing the telephone as the end-device for e-service delivery, implementers can automate those parts of a government process that can deliver value quickly, through "smaller" (less complicated, therefore less likely to fail) applications. By not seeking to re-engineer entire government departments, these projects face less resistance to change from public-sector employees. Given that over 90% of those at the BOP use phones already [15], significant use is more likely if the necessary attention is paid to language, design and publicity.

The Internet, accessed at a telecenter, and sophisticated e-Government systems will play a role in providing "higher-end" citizen services, for example submitting a passport application online with an uploaded digital photograph. But at a time when the Internet is barely reaching 10.3 million people at the BOP in these countries, the paper argues that phones are the cheaper, more immediate and ubiquitous tool for Asian governments to inform, transact and interact with almost 400 million of their most needy citizens.

The paper presents an alternative, telephone-centric model for electronic delivery of public services citizens. It draws on research conducted by LIRNEasia in 2006 and previously published as well as unpublished e-Gov case studies.

References

  1. Amin, D. (2005). Village information kiosks: a commercial view. In H. Badshah, S. Khan & M. Garrido (Eds.), Connected for Development: Information Kiosks and Sustainability. (pp. 117--125). New York: United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari, S. (2006). Telecenters and Community Resource and Information Centers in Pakistan. http://ifossf.org/files/Telecenters%20in%20Pakistan%20Volume%201.pdf. (Referenced August 23, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asia Pacific Development Information Programme. (2007). ICT4D Case Studies. http://www.apdip.net/resources/case/egov/ (referenced August 20, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (2007). Statistics. http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/pics_n_docs/_cei/_docs/ei/mei_2007june.pdf. (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Colle, R. (2000). Communication Shops and Telecenters in Developing Nations. In Gurstein, M. (Ed), Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications, Technologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ComputerWorld. (2007). Computerworld Honors Program Case Study: Globe Telecom. Retrieved August 23, 2007 from http://www.cwhonors.org/case_studies/GlobeTelecom.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Conroy, C. (2006). Telecenter Initiatives in Rural India: Failed Fad or Way Forward? http://www.nri.org/news/documents/wp4_telecentres_review_dec2006.pdf (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Drishtee Foundation. (2007). http://www.drishteefoundation.org/ (Referenced August 20, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ESOMAR. (1997). Standard Demographic Classification. A System of International Socio-economic Classification of Respondents to Survey Research, European Society for Opinion Marketing Research, Amsterdam. http://forum.gfk.ru/filestore/0082/0019/516/stand_democlass97.pdf (Referenced 23 August, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimsley, M. & Meehan, A. (2007). E-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 134--148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gyandoot. (2007). Development. http://www.gyandoot.nic.in/dhar_district/development.html (Referenced August 20, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ICTA. (2007). ICTA launches Nenasala at Foreign Employment Bureau. http://www.icta.lk/insidePages/news&event/010307whatsnew.asp (Referenced 25 August, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ITC. (2007). http://www.itcportal.com/ruraldevp_philosophy/echoupal.htm (Referenced August 20, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Soleil. (2007). Survie des télécentres et télé-services au Sénégal. L'Unetts invite l'Etat à mettre en place un cadre réglementaire adapté. http://www.lesoleil.sn/article.php3?id_article=27464 (Referenced August 24 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. LIRNEasia. (2006). Teleuse at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Retrieved August 15, 2007 from http://www.lirneasia.net/projects/current-projects/bopteleuse/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Moon, M. J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62 (4), 424--434Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mukherjee, A. (2003). Passport status information on SMS. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/45603653.cms (Referenced 23 August, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Murray, W. & Cornford, D. (1999). Telecottage and telecentre survey 1998. http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ univ_access/seminar/buda/papers/bm/TCA-98-SURVEY.html (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pakistan Telecom Authority. (2007). Media Center. http://www.pta.gov.pk/index.php?option=com_content&task =view&id=890&catid=94&Itemid=1&bold=ghar (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rebello, J. (2006). Card payments are on the growth. http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1067791 (Referenced 25 August, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Samarajiva, R. & Galpaya, H. (2006). Comment {on Sri Lanka case studies}, Pro-Poor E-Governance, Regional Development Dialogue, 27 (2). United Nations Centre for Regional Development, Nagoya, JapanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Santos, R. & Heeks, R (2003). ICTs and Intra-Governmental Structures at Local, Regional and Central Levels: Updating Conventional Ideas. Manchester, UK: IPDM, University of ManchesterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaffer R. (2007). Unplanned Obsolescence. http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/118/unplannedobsolescence.html (Referenced August 23, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Smart. (2007). Financial services. Smart money. http://www.smart.com.ph/Corporate/Services/SmartMoney/ (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Synergy Strategies Group. (2007). Center-in-a-Box. http://www.synergystrategiesgroup.com/caseStudies/CaseStu dy1_CenterInABox.pdf (Referenced 25 August, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tarahaat. (2007). About us. http://59.176.72.70/tara/aboutusEnglish (Referenced August 20, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres, L., Pina, V. & Acerete, B. (2006). E-Governance Developments in EU Cities. Reshaping Government's Relationship with Citizens. Governance, 19 (2), 277--302Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. West, D. (2004). E-government and the Transformation of Service- Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64 (1), 15--27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wizzit. (2007). http://www.wizzit.co.za/ (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wong W., Hanchanlash J., Harris R., Chatikavanij V. & Barr D. (2005). Thailand Canada Telecenter Project. In H. Badshah, S. Khan & M. Garrido (Eds.), Connected for development: information kiosks and sustainability. (pp. 179--190). New York: United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task ForceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. World Bank, (2004). Project Appraisal Document for e-Sri Lanka. http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WD SP/IB/2004/09/10/000009486_20040910112659/Rendered/PDF/28979a.pdf (Referenced August 22, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter Benjamin (2001). Telecenters in South Africa. Journal of Development Communication, 2 (12), 32--38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. De Silva, H. & Zainudeen, A. (2007). Teleuse on a Shoestring: Poverty reduction through telecom access at the 'Bottom of the Pyramid'. Presented at Centre for Poverty Analysis Annual Symposium on Poverty Research, Colombo, Sri Lanka. http://www.lirneasia.net/wp- content/uploads/2007/04/lirneasia_teleuse_cepa_-mar07_v30.pdf (Referenced 31 October, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kavanaugh A., Reese D. & Perez Quinones M. (2007). Mobile Phone as Scaffolding Technology: How low literacy groups might learn computing. Presented at the 35th annual Telecom Policy Research Conference, 28-30 Sep 2007, Virginia, USA. http://www.tprc.org (Referenced Nov 1, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. m-Govworld. (2007). Soochna se samadhan (lifeline India) - Knowledge based services for farmers on phones. http://www.mgovworld.org/topstory/soochna-se-samadhanlifeline- india-knowledge-based-services-for-farmers-on-phones (Referenced 31 October, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Taking e-government to the bottom of the pyramid: dial-a-gov?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance
      December 2007
      471 pages
      ISBN:9781595938220
      DOI:10.1145/1328057

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 December 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '07 Paper Acceptance Rate33of130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader