ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Formalizing XML access control for update operations
Full text pdf formatPdf (194 KB)
Source
Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Sophia Antipolis, France
SESSION: Short papers: access control table of contents
Pages: 169 - 174  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-745-2
Authors
Irini Fundulaki  University of Edinburgh, UK
Sebastian Maneth  NICTA Ltd. and UNSW, Australia
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 168,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1266840.1266868
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Several languages have been proposed over the past years which support the specification of access control on XML data. Most of these languages consider read-access restrictions only and do not deal with access rights for updates(such as add, delete, or modify operations). Fine-grain XML update operations are subject to current research. This paper proposes XACU, a language for specifying access control on XML data in the presence of update operations. The update operations used in XACU are based on the W3CX Query Update Facility working draft. A formal access control model is defined which allows to study properties of XACU access policies. One essential property is consistency the policy should not allow the execution of a sequence of updates which has the same total effect as an update forbidden by the policy. Since XACU is a rich language with inherent ambiguities, checking consistency of a set of XACU rules is difficult, and undecidable in general.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
L. Bouganim, F.-D. Ngoc, et al. Client-Based Access Control Management for XML documents. In VLDB. 2004.
 
3
D. Chamberlin, D. Florescu, et al. XQuery Update Facility. http://www.w3.org/TR/xqupdate/, July 2006.
 
4
S. Cho, S. Amer-Yahia, et al. Optimizing the Secure Evaluation of Twig Queries. In VLDB. 2002.
5
6
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
S. Godik and T. M. (eds). eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) Version 1.0. OASIS Standard, 2003 February.
12
13
14
 
15
M. Marx. XPath with conditional axis relations. In EDBT. 2004.
16
 
17
M. Oshry, B. Porter, et al. Authorizing Read Access to XML Content Using the access-control Processing Instruction 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/access-control, 2006 May. gobble.
18
19
 
20
XML Access Control. http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/xml/xacl/.
 
21
XUpdate: XML Update Language. http://www.xmldb.org/xupdate, 2000.
 
22
T. Yu, D. Srivastava, et al. Compressed Accessibility Map: Efficient Access Control for XML Documents. In VLDB. 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Irini Fundulaki: colleagues
Sebastian Maneth: colleagues