Sari Kujala
Marjo Kauppinen
ABSTRACT
It is critical to the success of a system that appropriate and representative users are involved in the development work. However, the process of identifying and selecting users has not been a focus of research. In this paper, we describe a process of identifying and selecting relevant users specifically for field studies. Characterization and sampling of users are discussed. In addition, a way of describing user groups is suggested. Finally, we summarize results from seven case studies in six different companies. The case studies show that developers tend to underestimate the diversity of users and that a systematic process helps to identify the different user groups, select representative users and identify representative user needs. It was found that identification of users' characteristics and groups is an iterative process, and user descriptions evolve when real data are gathered from users.
- Bekker, M. and Long, J. User involvement in the design of human-computer interactions: Some similarities and differences between design approaches. In McDonald, S., Waern, Y., and Cockton, G. (eds.), People and Computers XV (Proceedings of HCI'2000), Springer-Verlag, 135--147.Google Scholar
- Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blomquist, A. and Arvola, M. Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team. In Proc. NordiCHI2002 conference, pp. 197--200. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, A. The inmates are running the asylum. Macmillan: Indianapolis, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dillon, A., and Watson, C. User analysis in HCI-the historical lessons from individual differences research. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 45, (1996), 619--637. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large product development organizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, (1991), 147--196.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. and Pruitt, J. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. Proc. PDC 2002, pp. 144--161.Google Scholar
- Hackos, J. T. and Redish, J. C. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. Wiley, New York, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karat, J. Evolving the scope of user-centered design. Communications of the ACM, 40, 7 (1997), 33--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kujala, S. User Studies: A Practical Approach to User Involvement for Gathering User Needs and Requirements. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics and Computing Series No. 116. The Finnish Academies of Technology, Espoo, 2002. A summary available in: http://lib.hut.fi/Diss/2002/isbn9512259001/Google Scholar
- Kujala, S., Kauppinen, M., Nakari, P., Rekola, S. (2003). Field Studies in Practice: Making it Happen. In Proc. Interact 2003 Conference, IOS Press, pp. 359--366.Google Scholar
- Kujala, S. and Mäntylä,, M. (2000). How effective are user studies? In McDonald, S., Waern, Y., and Cockton, G. (Eds.), People and Computers XIV, Springer-Verlag, 61--71.Google Scholar
- Noyes, J. and Baber, C. User-Centred Design of Systems. Springer, London, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Olson, E. L. and Bakke, G. Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study of intentions versus actions. The journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 6, 2001, 388--395.Google Scholar
- Poltrock, S. E. and Grudin, J. Organizational obstacles to interface design and development: Two participant-observer studies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1, 1, 1994, 52--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Proctor, T. Essentials of Marketing Research (2nd Ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education, 2000.Google Scholar
- Redish, J. and Wixon, J. Task analysis. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.) The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N. J., 2003, pp. 922--940. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sinha, R. Persona development for information-rich domains, in CHI'03 extended abstracts, ACM Press, 830--831. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, A., Bekker, M., Johnson, P., and Johnson, H. Helping and hindering user involvement - A tale of everyday design, in Proceedings of CHI'97, ACM Press, 178--185. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wixon, D. R., Ramey, J., Holtzblatt, K, Beyer, H., Hackos, J., Rosenbaum, S. and Page, C, Laakso, S. A. and Laakso, K. (2002). Usability in practice: Field methods evolution and revolution. In Extended Abstracts of CHI'2002, 880--884. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wixon, D. and Wilson, C. The usability engineering framework for product design and evaluation. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, P. V. Prabhu (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997, pp. 653--688.Google Scholar
- von Hippel, E. New product ideas from lead users. Research Technology Management, (May/June, 1989), 24--27.Google Scholar
Recommendations
User-centered design and fundamental need
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesThis paper will discuss whether User-Centered Design (UCD) is capable and/or oriented towards satisfying users' fundamental needs. At face value, UCD is the advocate of the user in product development, but do its actual practices and values address what ...
The challenges of user-centered design and evaluation for infrastructure
CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInfrastructure software comprises code libraries or runtime processes that support the development or operation of application software. A particular infrastructure system may support certain styles of application, and may even determine the features of ...
Comments