ABSTRACT
Consumers' purchase decisions are increasingly influenced by user-generated online reviews. Accordingly, there has been growing concern about the potential for posting deceptive opinion spam---fictitious reviews that have been deliberately written to sound authentic, to deceive the reader. But while this practice has received considerable public attention and concern, relatively little is known about the actual prevalence, or rate, of deception in online review communities, and less still about the factors that influence it.
We propose a generative model of deception which, in conjunction with a deception classifier, we use to explore the prevalence of deception in six popular online review communities: Expedia, Hotels.com, Orbitz, Priceline, TripAdvisor, and Yelp. We additionally propose a theoretical model of online reviews based on economic signaling theory, in which consumer reviews diminish the inherent information asymmetry between consumers and producers, by acting as a signal to a product's true, unknown quality. We find that deceptive opinion spam is a growing problem overall, but with different growth rates across communities. These rates, we argue, are driven by the different signaling costs associated with deception for each review community, e.g., posting requirements. When measures are taken to increase signaling cost, e.g., filtering reviews written by first-time reviewers, deception prevalence is effectively reduced.
- C. Bond and B. DePaulo. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3):214, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ cjlin/libsvm. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cone. 2011 Online Influence Trend Tracker. Online: http://www.coneinc.com/negative-reviews-online-reverse-purchase-decisions, August 2011.Google Scholar
- B. DePaulo, D. Kashy, S. Kirkendol, M. Wyer, and J. Epstein. Lying in everyday life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(5):979, 1996.Google Scholar
- J. Hancock. Digital Deception: The Practice of Lying in the Digital Age. Deception: Methods, Contexts and Consequences, pages 109--120, 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Hancock, J. Thom-Santelli, and T. Ritchie. Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 129--134. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Hu, L. Liu, and J. Zhang. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3):201--214, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion spam and analysis. In Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, pages 219--230. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Johnson, J. Gastwirth, and L. Pearson. Screening without a "gold standard": The Hui-Walter paradigm revisited. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153(9):921, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Joseph, T. Gyorkos, and L. Coupal. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141(3):263, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Lim, V. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. Lauw. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 939--948. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Meyer. Fake reviews prompt belkin apology. http://news.cnet.com/8301--1001_3--10145399--92.html, Jan. 2009.Google Scholar
- R. Mihalcea and C. Strapparava. The lie detector: Explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 309--312. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Miller. Company settles case of reviews it faked. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/technology/internet/15lift.html, July 2009.Google Scholar
- M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. Hancock. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pages 309--319. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Page. Amazon withdraws ebook explaining how to manipulate its sales rankings. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jan/05/amazon-ebook-manipulate-kindle-rankings, Jan. 2011.Google Scholar
- K. Serota, T. Levine, and F. Boster. The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36(1):2--25, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Spence. Job market signaling. The quarterly journal of Economics, 87(3):355, 1973.Google Scholar
- D. Streitfeld. In a race to out-rave, 5-star web reviews go for $5. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/20/technology/finding-fake-reviews-online.html, Aug. 2011.Google Scholar
- D. Streitfeld. For $2 a star, an online retailer gets 5-star product reviews. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/technology/for-2-a-star-a-retailer-gets-5-star-reviews.html, Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
- A. Topping. Historian Orlando Figes agrees to pay damages for fake reviews. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/jul/16/orlando-figes-fake-amazon-reviews, July 2010.Google Scholar
- A. Vrij. Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Wiley-Interscience, 2008.Google Scholar
- K. Yoo and U. Gretzel. Comparison of Deceptive and Truthful Travel Reviews. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009, pages 37--47, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities
Recommendations
Online Review Solicitations Reduce Extremity Bias in Online Review Distributions and Increase Their Representativeness
Representative online customer reviews are critical to the effective functioning of the Internet economy. In this study, I investigate the representativeness of online review distributions to examine how extremity bias and conformity impact it and explore ...
Supply chain operations with online platform: Impacts of online reviews and manufacturer competition
Highlights- Online reviews in a market would modify consumers' perceptions of quality.
- Impact of online reviews and manufacturer competition on supply chain decisions and profits.
- Different levels of online reviews that leads to different ...
AbstractIn an e-commerce market dominated by online platforms, as an important means of disseminating product information, online reviews play a significant role in influencing consumer-purchasing behavior. To study the influence of online reviews on ...
The effect of positive and negative signals on perceived deceptiveness of websites in online markets
This study extends the understanding of signaling in online shopping environments by evaluating the effect of positive and negative signals on perceptions of online buyers. Drawing from signaling theory, this study proposes and empirically tests a model ...
Comments