skip to main content
10.1145/1840784.1840789acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiixConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A survey of patent users: an analysis of tasks, behavior, search functionality and system requirements

Published:18 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

With a growing interest in Patent Information Retrieval, there is a need to better understand the context associated with patent users, their tasks, needs and expectations of patent search systems and applications. Patent search is known to be a complex, difficult and challenging activity, usually requiring expert Patent Information Specialists to spend a substantial amount of time sourcing (or not) documents relevant to their particular task. Information Retrieval provides a whole array of possible techniques and tools which could be applied to ease the burden of such retrieval tasks, and also make searching patents more accessible to non-Patent Information Specialists. In this paper, we report the findings from a survey of patent users conducted to ascertain information about patent users and their search requirements with respect to Information Retrieval systems and applications.

References

  1. S. Adams. The text, the full text and nothing but the text: Part 1 -- standards for creating textual information in patent documents and general search implications. World Patent Information, 32(1):22--29, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Adams. The text, the full text and nothing but the text: Part 2 -- the main specification, searching challenges and survey of availability. World Patent Information, 32(2):120--128, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. N. J. Akers. The european patent system: an introduction for patent searchers. World Patent Information, 21(3):135--163, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. H. Atkinson. Toward a more rational patent search paradigm. In Proceeding of Patent Information Retrieval Workshop at CIKM '08, pages 37--40. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Bonino, A. Ciaramella, and F. Corno. Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics. World Patent Information, 32(1):30--38, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):3--10, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. N. D. Hunt and M. Rodgers. Patent Searching. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Foglia. Patentability search strategies and the reformed ipc: A patent office perspective. World Patent Information, 29(1):33--53, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Ingwersen and K. Järvelin. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. W. Kitch. The nature and function of the patent system. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2):265--290, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. McDonald-Maier. esp@cenetÂĺ: Survey reveals new information about users. World Patent Information, 31(2):142--143, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Newton. A survey of users of the new british library patent information centre. World Patent Information, 22(4):317--323, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. E. S. Simmons. Patent databases and gresham's law. World Patent Information, 28(4):291--293, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Spink, D. Wolfram, M. B. J. Jansen, and T. Saracevic. Searching the Web: The Public and Their Queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3):226--234, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y.-H. Tseng and Y.-J. Wu. A study of search tactics for patentability search: a case study on patent engineers. In Proceeding of Patent Information Retrieval Workshop at CIKM '08, pages 33--36. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A survey of patent users: an analysis of tasks, behavior, search functionality and system requirements

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IIiX '10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context
      August 2010
      408 pages
      ISBN:9781450302470
      DOI:10.1145/1840784

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate21of45submissions,47%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader