Skip to main content
Log in

On Batalin–Vilkovisky formalism of non-commutative field theories

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply the BV formalism to non-commutative field theories, introduce BRST symmetry, and gauge-fix the models. Interestingly, we find that treating the full gauge symmetry in non-commutative models can lead to reducible gauge algebras. As one example we apply the formalism to the Connes–Lott two-point model. Finally, we offer a derivation of a superversion of the Harish-Chandra–Itzykson–Zuber integral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Seiberg, E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 9909, 032 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9908142

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Grosse, R. Wulkenhaar, Commun. Math. Phys. 256, 305 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0401128

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Grosse, R. Wulkenhaar, Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 277 (2004). arXiv: hep-th/0402093

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Disertori, R. Gurau, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, Phys. Lett. B 649, 95 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0612251

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Rivasseau, arXiv:0705.0705

  6. B. Jurco, L. Moller, S. Schraml, P. Schupp, J. Wess, Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 383 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0104153

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bichl, J. Grimstrup, H. Grosse, L. Popp, M. Schweda, R. Wulkenhaar, J. High Energy Phys. 0106, 013 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0104097

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. de Goursac, J.C. Wallet, R. Wulkenhaar, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 977 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0703075

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Grosse, M. Wohlgenannt, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 435 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0703169

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. D.N. Blaschke, H. Grosse, M. Schweda, Europhys. Lett. 79, 61002 (2007). arXiv:0705.4205 [hep-th]

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L.C.Q. Vilar, O.S. Ventura, D.G. Tedesco, V.E.R. Lemes, arXiv:0902.2956 [hep-th]

  12. D.N. Blaschke, A. Rofner, M. Schweda, R.I.P. Sedmik, Europhys. Lett. 86, 51002 (2009). arXiv:0903.4811 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. I.A. Batalin, G.A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B 102, 27 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. I.A. Batalin, G.A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2567 (1983) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 30, 508 (1984)]

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. I.A. Batalin, K. Bering, arXiv:0911.0341 [hep-th]. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A (to appear)

  16. A. Connes, J. Lott, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 18B, 29 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Chas, D.P. Sullivan, arXiv:math/9911159 [math.GT]

  18. B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B 390, 33 (1993). arXiv:hep-th/9206084

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. I.A. Batalin, K. Bering, P.H. Damgaard, Nucl. Phys. B 739, 389 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0512131

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Barnich, M.A. Grigoriev, M. Henneaux, J. High Energy Phys. 0110, 004 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0106188

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, M. Grigoriev, Fortschr. Phys. 50, 825 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0201139

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 57 (1995). arXiv:hep-th/9405109

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, M. Grigoriev, Nucl. Phys. B 677, 503 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0308092

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Hüffel, J. Math. Phys. 43, 2348 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0109134

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Hüffel, Acta Phys. Slovaca 52, 247 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0206048

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harish-Chandra, Am. J. Math. 79, 87 (1957)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Harish-Chandra, Am. J. Math. 80, 241 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Itzykson, J.B. Zuber, J. Math. Phys. 21, 411 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. J.J. Duistermaat, G.J. Heckman, Invent. Math. 69, 259 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Alfaro, R. Medina, L.F. Urrutia, J. Math. Phys. 36, 3085 (1995). arXiv:hep-th/9412012

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Guhr, Commun. Math. Phys. 176, 555 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Stone, Nucl. Phys. B 314, 557 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R.J. Szabo, Nucl. Phys. B 598, 309 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0009237

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R.J. Szabo, arXiv:hep-th/9608068

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Bering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bering, K., Grosse, H. On Batalin–Vilkovisky formalism of non-commutative field theories. Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 313–324 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1323-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1323-5

Keywords

Navigation