Skip to main content
Log in

Generic size dependences of pairing in ultrasmall systems: electronic nano-devices and atomic nuclei

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the average and global pairing behaviours of electronic devices, like films, wires, and grains using semiclassical methods, such as Weyl and Thomas–Fermi approximations, in the ultrasmall, i.e., quantal regime, which exhibits strong quantum fluctuations and shell effects. We discuss how these results, mostly analytic, are elaborated for average size dependencies, in order to be used in other circumstances when the fully quantal calculation become computationally too expensive. We also compare the results with latest experimental one where possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data are contained in the figures.]

Notes

  1. Notice that in the system under consideration here spin-orbit couplings are negligible hence spin is a good quantum number.

References

  1. M. Beasley, A history of superconductivity. In: Advances in Superconductivity: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Superconductivity (ISS’88), August 28–31, 1988, Nagoya (Springer, 1989), pp. 3–15

  2. J. Bardeen, L.N. Cooper, J.R. Schrieffer, Microscopic theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 106, 162–164 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.162

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, D. Pines, Possible analogy between the excitation spectra of nuclei and those of the superconducting metallic state. Phys. Rev. 110(4), 936 (1958)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Ring, P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-body Problem (Springer, Berlin, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.N. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (in 2 Volumes) (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. V.Z. Kresin, Y.N. Ovchinnikov, Pair correlation in nano systems. Ann. Phys. 417, 168141 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. P.W. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11(1–2), 26–30 (1959)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.A. Maruhn, P.G. Reinhard, E. Suraud, Density functional theory. In: Simple Models of Many-Fermion Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03839-6_6

  9. A. Shanenko, M. Croitoru, Shape resonances in the superconducting order parameter of ultrathin nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 73(1), 012510 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Shanenko, M. Croitoru, M. Zgirski, F. Peeters, K. Arutyunov, Size-dependent enhancement of superconductivity in al and sn nanowires: shape-resonance effect. Phys. Rev. B 74(5), 052502 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Shanenko, M. Croitoru, F. Peeters, Oscillations of the superconducting temperature induced by quantum well states in thin metallic films: numerical solution of the bogoliubov-de gennes equations. Phys. Rev. B 75(1), 014519 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Chen, W. Hong-Yu, F. Peeters, A. Shanenko, Quantum-size effects and thermal response of anti-Kramer–Pesch vortex core. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27(12), 125701 (2015)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Croitoru, A. Shanenko, C. Kaun, F. Peeters, Metallic nanograins: spatially nonuniform pairing induced by quantum confinement. Phys. Rev. B 83(21), 214509 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Bose, A.M. García-García, M.M. Ugeda, J.D. Urbina, C.H. Michaelis, I. Brihuega, K. Kern, Observation of shell effects in superconducting nanoparticles of sn. Nat. Mater. 9(7), 550–554 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A.M. García-García, J.D. Urbina, E.A. Yuzbashyan, K. Richter, B.L. Altshuler, Bcs superconductivity in metallic nanograins: finite-size corrections, low-energy excitations, and robustness of shell effects. Phys. Rev. B 83(1), 014510 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Mayoh, A.M. García-García, Number theory, periodic orbits, and superconductivity in nanocubes. Phys. Rev. B 90(1), 014509 (2014)

  17. R. Balian, C. Bloch, Distribution of eigenfrequencies for the wave equation in a finite domain: I. Three-dimensional problem with smooth boundary surface. Ann. Phys. 60(2), 401–447 (1970)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Farine, F.W. Hekking, P. Schuck, X. Vinas, Generic finite-size enhancement of pairing in mesoscopic fermi systems. Phys. Rev. B 68(2), 024507 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Grasso, M. Urban, Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov theory versus local-density approximation for superfluid trapped fermionic atoms. Phys. Rev. A 68, 033610 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.033610

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Viñas, P. Schuck, M. Farine, Thomas-fermi approximation to pairing in finite fermi systems. The weak coupling regime. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 321, 012024 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Vinas, P. Schuck, M. Farine, Semiclassical description of average pairing properties in nuclei. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20(02), 399–405 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Schuck, X. Viñas, Suppression of superfluidity upon overflow of trapped fermions: quantal and Thomas–Fermi studies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 205301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.205301

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Schuck, X. Vinas, Thomas-fermi studies of pairing in inhomogeneous systems: nuclear and cold atom systems at overflow. In: Fifty Years of Nuclear BCS: Pairing in Finite Systems (World Scientific, 2013), pp. 212–226

  24. M. Centelles, P. Schuck, X. Vinas, Thomas–Fermi theory for atomic nuclei revisited. Ann. Phys. 322(2), 363–396 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Bulgac, Y. Yu, Renormalization of the Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov equations in the case of a zero range pairing interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(4), 042504 (2002)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Stocker, M. Farine, Perturbational approach for the curvature correction to the surface tension via the Hartree–Fock approximation for the plane surface. Ann. Phys. 159(2), 255–271 (1985)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Guo, Y.-F. Zhang, X.-Y. Bao, T.-Z. Han, Z. Tang, L.-X. Zhang, W.-G. Zhu, E. Wang, Q. Niu, Z. Qiu et al., Superconductivity modulated by quantum size effects. Science 306(5703), 1915–1917 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. R.W. Hasse, Angular momentum projected semiclassics. Nucl. Phys. A 467(3), 407–421 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. X. Vinas, P. Schuck, M. Farine, M. Centelles, Semiclassical evaluation of average nuclear one-and two-body matrix elements. Phys. Rev. C 67(5), 054307 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Mayoh, A.M. García-García, Inhomogenous pairing and enhancement of superconductivity in large sn nanograins. arXiv preprint (2013). arXiv:1309.6255

Download references

Acknowledgements

Working with Peter has been a privilege. Talking about physics with one of the funding fathers of the modern nuclear physics was always an opportunity to learn new things, but also to see physics problems from a different point of view. We think that his major strength was the capacity to see similarities between apparently different phenomena. For example, the motivation of this last work together has been his curiosity to observe similar trends in nano-devices and atomic nuclei. We will miss a great scientist but also a great human being: always cheerful and supportive. We thank M. Farine for early contributions to this work. M. Urban is greatly acknowledged for critical comments concerning the use of BCS versus HFB approaches. One of the authors (X.V.) acknowledges the partial support from Grants no. PID2020-118758GBI00 and no. CEX2019-000918-M (through the “Unit of Excellence María de Maeztu 2020-2023” award to ICCUB) from the Spanish MCIN/AEI (DOI 10.13039/501100011033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pastore.

Additional information

Communicated by David Blaschke.

Appendix A: Quantal study of a free particle in a hemi-sphere

Appendix A: Quantal study of a free particle in a hemi-sphere

The Schrödinger equation for a free particle confined in a half-sphere of radius R read

$$\begin{aligned} -\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\nabla ^2\psi _{nlm}(r,\theta ,\phi ) = E\psi _{nlm}(r,\theta ,\phi ). \end{aligned}$$
(A1)

The problem has very specific boundary conditions i.e. \(\psi _{nlm}(r,\theta ,\phi )\) is equal to zero at the edges of the half sphere. Before entering in a more detailed discussion, it is interesting to specify the system of reference. r represent the radial distance from the centre of the sphere and it can take all values in the range \(r\in [0,R]\). \(\theta \) is the angle formed by r with the axis of symmetry of the half sphere it goes from \(\theta \in [0,\pi /2]\). The value \(\theta =0\) indicates a point on the top of the half-sphere, the value \(\theta =\pi /2\) is placed on the disk closing the bottom of the half-sphere. \(\phi \) is the angle formed by the projection of r on xy-plane and it spans from 0 to \(2\pi \).

The boundary conditions can be then translated as

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} \psi _{nlm}(R,\theta ,\phi )=0 &{}\theta \ne \frac{\pi }{2},\\ \psi _{nlm}(r,\frac{\pi }{2},\phi )=0 &{}\theta = \frac{\pi }{2}, \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}$$

these two conditions take into account the fact that the wave-function is zero on the hemisphere and the disk delimiting the Hilbert space. To solve such a problem, we use the usual ansatz of

$$\begin{aligned} \psi _{nlm}(r,\theta ,\phi )\propto u_{nl}(r)Y_{lm}(\theta ,\phi ), \end{aligned}$$
(A2)

here nlm are the quantum number of the system. \(Y_{lm}(\theta ,\phi )\) is the spherical harmonic. Notice we neglect spin terms since there is no spin-orbit coupling and the terms simply factorise. We replace Eq. (A2) in Eq. (A1) and we get

$$\begin{aligned} -\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\left[ \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left( r^2\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\right) - \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}\right] u_{nl}(r) =E_{nl}u_{nl}(r).\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(A3)

By defining \(k_{nl}^2=\frac{2m}{\hbar ^2} E_{nl}\) and performing simple manipulations, we obtain the Bessel equation whose solution are the spherical Bessel functions \(u_{nl}(r)=j_{l}\left( k_{nl}r \right) \).

By imposing the first set of boundary conditions, i.e. \(u_{nl}(R)=0\), we obtain the discretisation of the eigen-spectrum. This condition is angle independent. In the case of a closed half-sphere, we also need to impose that the wave function is zero on the bottom disk closing the space. This condition should be valid for any value of r and fixed \(\theta =\pi /2\).

As such we have to impose this on the angular part of the wave function

$$\begin{aligned} Y_{lm}\left( \frac{\pi }{2},\phi \right) =0. \end{aligned}$$
(A4)

This is achieved simply by selecting the associated Legendre polynomial that are odd \(P_l^m(\cos \theta ) \), or in other words they have a node on the \(\theta =\pi /2\) plane. This conditions is respected for all polynomials so that \(l+m\) is an odd number (\(l=0\) excluded). As a consequence, we can solve the half-sphere problem using the same methodology used to solve the sphere, apart from the extra selection rule on the quantum number used to build the basis.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pastore, A., Schuck, P. & Viñas, X. Generic size dependences of pairing in ultrasmall systems: electronic nano-devices and atomic nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 241 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01155-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01155-9

Navigation