Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 1 March 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031203
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;64:474-479
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2006.031203v1
64/7/474    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirabelli, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Kogevinas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirabelli, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Kogevinas, M.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Occupational risk factors for asthma among nurses and related healthcare professionals in an international study

Maria C Mirabelli1, Jan-Paul Zock1, Estel Plana1, Josep Maria Antó1,2, Geza Benke3, Paul D Blanc4, Anna Dahlman-Höglund5, Deborah L Jarvis6, Hans Kromhout7, Linnéa Lillienberg5, Dan Norbäck8, Mario Olivieri9, Katja Radon10, Jordi Sunyer1,2, Kjell Torén11, Marc van Sprundel12, Simona Villani13, Manolis Kogevinas14

1 Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Municipal Institute of Medical Research, Barcelona, Spain
2 Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
3 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
4 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, California, USA
5 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
6 Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group, National Heart and Lung Insititute, Imperial College, London, UK
7 Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Environmental Epidemiology Division, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
8 Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University and University Hospital, Sweden
9 Unit of Occupational Medicine, University of Verona, Italy
10 Unit for Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology & NetTeaching, Institute for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
11 Department of Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
12 Department Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Antwerp, Belgium
13 Section of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
14 Department of Social Medicine, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M C Mirabelli
Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Instituto Municipal de Investigación Médica, c/Dr Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; mmirabelli{at}imim.es

Objective: The authors examined the relations between self-reported work tasks, use of cleaning products and latex glove use with new-onset asthma among nurses and other healthcare workers in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS II).

Methods: In a random population sample of adults from 22 European sites, 332 participants reported working in nursing and other related healthcare jobs during the nine-year ECRHS II follow-up period and responded to a supplemental questionnaire about their principal work settings, occupational tasks, products used at work and respiratory symptoms. Poisson regression models with robust error variances were used to compare the risk of new-onset asthma among healthcare workers with each exposure to that of respondents who reported professional or administrative occupations during the entire follow-up period (n = 2481).

Results: Twenty (6%) healthcare workers and 131 (5%) members of the referent population reported new-onset asthma. Compared to the referent group, the authors observed increased risks among hospital technicians (RR 4.63; 95% CI 1.87 to 11.5) and among those using ammonia and/or bleach at work (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.53).

Conclusions: In the ECRHS II cohort, hospital technicians and other healthcare workers experience increased risks of new-onset current asthma, possibly due to specific products used at work.


Abbreviations: ECRHS, European Community Respiratory Health Survey; ISCO, International Standard Classification of Occupations




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
X. Li, J. Sundquist, and K. Sundquist
Socioeconomic and occupational groups and risk of asthma in Sweden
Occup. Med., May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. S. Nawrot, E. Alfaro-Moreno, and B. Nemery
Update in Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 696 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
D. Loomis
Work in brief
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2007; 64(7): 429 - 429.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.