Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 9 November 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.026583
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;64:279-287
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2006.026583v1
64/4/279    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergström, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, I. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergström, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, I. B

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Risk factors for new episodes of sick leave due to neck or back pain in a working population. A prospective study with an 18-month and a three-year follow-up

Gunnar Bergström1, Lennart Bodin2, Helena Bertilsson1, Irene B Jensen1

1 The Karolinska Institute, Section for Personal Injury Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Unit of Statistics and Epidemiology, Clinical Research Centre, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Bergström
Section for Personal Injury Prevention, Karolinska Institute, Box 127 18, S-112 94 Stockholm, Sweden; gunnar.bergstrom{at}ki.se

Objectives: To identify risk factors for new episodes of sick leave due to neck or back pain.

Methods: This prospective study comprised an industrial population of 2187 employees who were followed up at 18 months and 3 years after a comprehensive baseline measurement. The potential risk factors comprised physical and psychosocial work factors, health-related and pain-related characteristics and lifestyle and demographic factors. The response rate at both follow-ups was close to 73%.

Results: At the 18-month follow-up, 151 participants reported at least one episode of sick-listing due to neck or back pain during the previous year. Risk factors assessed at baseline for sick leave due to neck or back pain at the follow-up were blue-collar work, back pain one or several times during the previous year, 1–99 days of cumulative sickness absence during the previous year (all causes except neck or back pain), uncertainty of one’s own working ability in 2 years’ time and the experience of few positive challenges at work. After 3 years, 127 participants reported at least one episode of sick leave due to back or neck pain during the year previous to follow-up. The risk factors for this pain-related sick leave were blue-collar work, several earlier episodes of neck pain, no everyday physical activities during leisure time (cleaning, gardening and so on), lower physical functioning and, for blue-collar workers separately, repetitive work procedures.

Conclusion: The most consistent risk factors for new episodes of sick leave due to neck or back pain found during both the follow-ups were blue-collar work and several earlier episodes of neck or back pain assessed at baseline. Preventive efforts to decrease sick leave due to neck or back pain may include measures to increase the occurrence of positive challenges at work and to minimise repetitive work procedures. An evidence-based secondary prevention of neck and back pain including advice to stay active is also warranted.


Abbreviations: SF-36, short form-36




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
M. Ghaffari, A. Alipour, A. A. Farshad, I. Jensen, M. Josephson, and E. Vingard
Effect of psychosocial factors on low back pain in industrial workers
Occup. Med., August 1, 2008; 58(5): 341 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K. Palmer
Work in brief
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2007; 64(4): e211 - e211.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.