HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: oem.2005.025221v1 63/5/359    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LaMontagne, A D Articles by Sim, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by LaMontagne, A D Articles by Sim, M

Primary prevention of latex related sensitisation and occupational asthma: a systematic review

¹ Centre for Health & Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
² Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Associate Professor A D LaMontagne
Centre for Health & Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; alamonta{at}unimelb.edu.au

Methods: Eight primary prevention intervention studies on natural rubber latex (NRL) published since 1990 were identified and reviewed. This is the largest evidence base of primary prevention studies for any occupational asthmagen.

Results: Review of this small and largely observational evidence base supports the following evidence statement: Substitution of powdered latex gloves with low protein powder-free NRL gloves or latex-free gloves greatly reduces NRL aeroallergens, NRL sensitisation, and NRL-asthma in healthcare workers. Evidence in support of this statement is ranked SIGN level 2+, referring to well conducted case-control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal.

Conclusion: Substitution of powdered latex gloves with low protein powder-free NRL gloves or latex-free gloves promises benefits to both workers’ health and cost and human resource savings for employers. This message should be broadly disseminated beyond the hospital sector to include other healthcare settings (such as aged care facilities) as well as food service and other industries where latex gloves might be used.

Keywords: natural rubber latex; intervention; primary prevention; systematic review

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Sripaiboonkij, W. Phanprasit, and M. S. Jaakkola Respiratory effects of occupational exposures in a milk powder factory Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 807 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Heederik and F. van Rooy Exposure assessment should be integrated in studies on the prevention and management of occupational asthma Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2008; 65(3): 149 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rask-Andersen and S. M. Tarlo Asthma among Health Care Professionals Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2007; 175(7): 633 - 634. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Abramson and M R Sim Occupational asthma. Thorax, September 1, 2006; 61(9): 741 - 742. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Palmer Work in brief Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2006; 63(5): 297 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]