JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2005;76:1167-1169; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.053744
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimmo-Smith, I
Right arrow Articles by Tegnér, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimmo-Smith, I
Right arrow Articles by Tegnér, R

SHORT REPORT

A diagnostic test of unawareness of bilateral motor task abilities in anosognosia for hemiplegia

I Nimmo-Smith1, A J Marcel1, R Tegnér2

1 Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology Section, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A J Marcel
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, UK; tony.marcel{at}mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP) is conventionally defined/diagnosed by generic questions about awareness of limb plegia. However, unawareness of inability to perform tasks requiring bilateral use of limbs is more widespread and outlasts generic unawareness of plegia. Some patients consistently overestimate bilateral task ability. Our aim was to assess how well specific questions about bilateral task ability predict whether patients consistently overestimate their abilities. Six statistical indices were calculated to rank the questions for predictiveness of consistency of overestimation of bilateral task ability. Overall, bimanual questions are better predictors than bipedal questions of consistent overestimation. Three bimanual and two bipedal questions had both sensitivity and specificity above 80%. On the basis of accuracy and discriminability, one bimanual and one bipedal question that performed maximally could be used for a quick bedside heuristic index. For a more thorough diagnostic, especially for research, five bimanual and two bipedal questions were good predictors, and should be used. For both purposes, such tests should be given in combination with conventional generic questions assessing awareness of limb plegia, since the two kinds of question reflect different kinds of unawareness of motor incapacity.


Abbreviations: AHP, anosognosia for hemiplegia; LBD, left brain damaged; RBD, right brain damaged

Keywords: anosognosia; cerebrovascular disorders; hemiplegia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. D. Orfei, R. G. Robinson, G. P. Prigatano, S. Starkstein, N. Rusch, P. Bria, C. Caltagirone, and G. Spalletta
Anosognosia for hemiplegia after stroke is a multifaceted phenomenon: a systematic review of the literature
Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3075 - 3090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.