HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jcp.2007.050971v1 jcp.2007.050971v2 61/4/455    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Cumiskey, J Articles by Gibbons, D PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cumiskey, J Articles by Gibbons, D

A detailed morphologic and immunohistochemical comparison of pre- and postmenopausal endometriosis

¹ Department of Histopathology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Dr J Cumiskey, MB MRCP, Department of Histopathology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles’ St., Dublin 2, Ireland; jocumiskey{at}gmail.com

Background: Endometriosis depends on oestrogenic stimulation for its continued growth, accounting for its prevalence during reproductive years. There is doubt among clinicians regarding its existence in postmenopausal women in the absence of exogenous or endogenous sex hormones. We postulated that endometriosis occurring in postmenopausal women would show a different morphologic and immunohistochemical profile to the disease occurring in premenopausal women.

Methods: We reviewed the most recent 100 cases of endometriosis in our department plus all cases occurring in women aged 50 dating back to 1999. Cases were divided into <50 (n = 91), 50–59 (8) and 60 (6), and analysed for extent of disease, proportions of epithelium and stroma, and amount of haemorrhage. Immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor (OR), progesterone receptor (PR) and CD10 was performed and analysed on all cases aged 50 and on controls <50.

Results: There was statistically less disease in older women when cases occurring in the cervix and in scars were excluded (p = 0.0191). There was no statistical difference in the proportions of epithelium or stroma, but there was a statistical difference in the amount of haemorrhage (p = 0.0154) with older women showing less haemorrhage. There was no significant difference in immunohistochemical profile.

Conclusions: Endometriosis does occur in postmenopausal women but is less common, is present in smaller volumes, and is less active. It has the same immunohistochemical profile as the disease occurring in premenopausal women and we infer from this that it has the potential to reactivate given the appropriate stimulation.