HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: hrt.2006.090894v1 93/4/458    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sekhri, N Articles by Timmis, A D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sekhri, N Articles by Timmis, A D Topic Collections Related Article

How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients

¹ Newham University Hospital, London, UK
² Barts and The London Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
³ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Medical School, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
A D Timmis
London Chest Hospital, Barts and The London NHS Trust, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, UK;timmis{at}lch.demon.co.uk

ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine whether rapid access chest pain clinics are clinically effective by comparison of coronary event rates in patients diagnosed with angina with rates in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain and the general population.

Design: Multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients with chest pain attending the rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) of six hospitals in England.

Participants: 8762 patients diagnosed with either non-cardiac chest pain (n = 6396) or incident angina without prior myocardial infarction (n = 2366) at first cardiological assessment, followed up for a median of 2.57 (interquartile range 1.96–4.15) years.

Main outcome measures: Primary end point—death due to coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)10 I20–I25) or acute coronary syndrome (non-fatal myocardial infarction (ICD10 I21–I23), hospital admission with unstable angina (I24.0, I24.8, I24.9)). Secondary end points—all-cause mortality (ICD I20), cardiovascular death (ICD10 I00–I99), or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (I60–I69).

Results: The cumulative probability of the primary end point in patients diagnosed with angina was 16.52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.88% to 18.32%) after 3 years compared with 2.73% (95% CI 2.29% to 3.25%) in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Coronary standardised mortality ratios for men and women with angina aged <65 years were 3.52 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.07) and 4.39 (95% CI 1.14 to 7.64). Of the 599 patients who had the primary end point, 194 (32.4%) had been diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain. These patients were younger, less likely to have typical symptoms, more likely to be south Asian and more likely to have a normal resting electrocardiogram than patients with angina who had the primary end point.

Conclusion: RACPCs are successful in identifying patients with incident angina who are at high coronary risk, but there is a need to reduce misdiagnosis and improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain who accounted for nearly one third of cardiac events during follow-up.

Abbreviations: ECG, electrocardiogram; RACPCs, rapid access chest pain clinics; SMR, standardised mortality ratio

Related Article

Value of rapid-access chest pain clinics

Roger M Boyle
Heart 2007 93: 415-416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Sekhri, A. Timmis, R. Chen, C. Junghans, N. Walsh, J. Zaman, S. Eldridge, H. Hemingway, and G. Feder Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris BMJ, May 10, 2008; 336(7652): 1058 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G L Taylor, N F Murphy, C Berry, J Christie, A Finlayson, K MacIntyre, C Morrison, and J McMurray Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 628 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hemingway, C. Langenberg, J. Damant, C. Frost, K. Pyorala, and E. Barrett-Connor Prevalence of Angina in Women Versus Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of International Variations Across 31 Countries Circulation, March 25, 2008; 117(12): 1526 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rosengren Psychology in chest pain Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 266 - 267. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D Timmis, G. Feder, and H. Hemingway Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 786 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M Boyle Value of rapid-access chest pain clinics Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 415 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]