BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:328-332; doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.078832
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Overdam, K A
Right arrow Articles by de Waard, P W T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Overdam, K A
Right arrow Articles by de Waard, P W T

EXTENDED REPORT

Baerveldt glaucoma implant in paediatric patients

K A van Overdam, J T H N de Faber, H G Lemij, P W T de Waard

The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
P W T de Waard
The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Schiedamse Vest 180, 3011 BH Rotterdam, Netherlands; pwt.de.waard{at}xs4all.nl

Aim: To evaluate the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) in paediatric glaucoma treatment.

Methods: In a retrospective non-comparative case series 55 eyes of 40 consecutive paediatric patients (<=16 years) with primary or secondary glaucoma underwent Baerveldt (350 mm2) implantation. Surgical outcome was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier table analysis.

Results: The overall success rate was 80% at last follow up, with a mean follow up of 32 (range 2–78) months. Cumulative success was 94% at 12 months and 24 months, 85% at 36 months, 78% at 48 months, and 44% at 60 months. 11 eyes (20%) failed postoperatively because of an IOP >21 mm Hg (eight eyes), persistent hypotony (two eyes), and choroidal haemorrhage following cataract surgery (one eye). The most frequent complication needing surgery was tube related (20%). A new observation was mild to moderate dyscoria in 22% of the eyes, all buphthalmic, caused by entrapment of a tuft of peripheral iris in the tube track.

Conclusions: The BGI is effective and safe in the management of primary and secondary glaucoma. When angle surgery has proved to be unsuccessful or inappropriate in paediatric patients, a BGI is a good treatment option. One must be prepared to deal with the tube related problems.


Keywords: glaucoma; Baerveldt implant; congenital glaucoma; paediatrics







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.