HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: adc.2007.125146v1 93/1/35    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, L Articles by Reilly, J J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stewart, L Articles by Reilly, J J

Parents’ journey through treatment for their child’s obesity: a qualitative study

¹ University of Glasgow, Division of Developmental Medicine, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow, UK
² Department of Dietetics, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow, UK
³ University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
John J Reilly, University Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, 1st Floor Tower Block QMH, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Scotland, UK; jjr2y{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Background: Treatment for childhood obesity is characterised by patient non-attendance and drop-out, and widespread failure to achieve weight maintenance. Qualitative methods may improve our understanding of patient perceptions and so improve treatment for childhood obesity.

Aim: To provide insight into the perceptions of parents of obese children as they "journey" from pre-treatment to end of treatment.

Methods: We used purposive sampling and studied 17 parents of children (mean (SD) age 8.4 (2.1) years) attending 6-month outpatient treatments for obesity (BMI>98th percentile). Parent’s perceptions were explored by in-depth interviews, analysed using Framework methods.

Results: Parents were characterised as being unaware of their child’s weight, in denial or actively seeking treatment. Parents were consistently motivated to enter treatment due to perceived benefits to their child’s self-esteem or quality of life, and weight outcomes appeared typically less important. During treatment parents felt there was a lack of support for lifestyle changes outside the clinic, and noted that members of the extended family often undermined or failed to support lifestyle changes. Parents generally felt that treatment should have continued beyond 6 months and that it had provided benefits to their child’s well-being, self-esteem and quality of life, and this is what motivated many to remain engaged with treatment.

Discussion: This study may help inform future treatments for childhood obesity by providing insights into the aspects of treatment of greatest importance to parents. Future treatments may need to consider providing greater support for lifestyle changes within the extended family, and may need to focus more on psycho-social outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Varma Parents' Perspectives Regarding Treatment of Childhood Obesity AAP Grand Rounds, April 1, 2008; 19(4): 43 - 44. [Full Text] [PDF]