HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: adc.2006.104869v1 92/10/876    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davey Smith, G. Articles by Ness, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davey Smith, G. Articles by Ness, A. Topic Collections Related Articles

Is there an intrauterine influence on obesity? Evidence from parent–child associations in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

¹ Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
² Community Based Medicine, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Clifton, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
George Davey Smith, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK; zetkin{at}bristol.ac.uk

Background: It has been suggested that increasing obesity levels in young women lead to intrauterine environments that, in turn, stimulate increased obesity among their offspring, generating an intergenerational acceleration of obesity levels. If this mechanism is important, the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with offspring BMI should be stronger than the association of paternal with offspring BMI.

Objective: To compare the relative strengths of association of maternal and paternal BMI with offspring BMI at age 7.5, taking into account the possible effect of non-paternity.

Methods: We compared strength of association for maternal–offspring and paternal–offspring BMI for 4654 complete parent–offspring trios in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), using unstandardised and standardised regression analysis. We carried out a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of non-paternity on these associations.

Results: The strength of association between parental BMI and offspring BMI at age 7.5 was similar for both parents. Taking into account correlations between maternal and paternal BMI, performing standardised rather than unstandardised regression and carrying out a sensitivity analysis for non-paternity emphasised the robustness of the general similarity of the associations. The associations between high parental BMI (top decile) and offspring BMI are also similar for both parents.

Conclusion: Comparison of mother–offspring and father–offspring associations for BMI suggests that intergenerational acceleration mechanisms do not make an important contribution to levels of childhood BMI within the population. Associations at later ages and for different components of body composition now require study.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A Lawlor, G. D. Smith, and M. Kivimaki Reply to TJ Cole et al Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1536 - 1537. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bush Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2007 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 686 - 695. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A Leon Commentary: The development of the Ounsteds' theory of maternal constraint--a critical perspective Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 255 - 259. [Full Text] [PDF]