ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 20 July 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.098335
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:486-489
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.098335v1
92/6/486    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loening-Baucke, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loening-Baucke, V.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence

Vera Loening-Baucke

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Vera Loening-Baucke
Children’s Hospital, JCP 2555, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; vera-loening-baucke{at}uiowa.edu

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence in children attending primary care clinics in the United States.

Methods: Retrospective review of case records of all children, 4–17 years of age, seen for at least one health maintenance visit during a 6 month period and followed from birth or within the first 6 months of age in our clinics. We reviewed all charts for constipation, faecal incontinence and urinary incontinence.

Results: We included 482 children in the study, after excluding 39 children with chronic diseases. The prevalence rate for constipation was 22.6% and was similar in boys and girls. The constipation was functional in 18% and acute in 4.6%. The prevalence rate for faecal incontinence (>=1/week) was 4.4%. The faecal incontinence was associated with constipation in 95% of our children. The prevalence rate for urinary incontinence was 10.5%; 3.3% for daytime only, 1.8% for daytime with night-time and 5.4% for night-time urinary incontinence. Faecal and urinary incontinence were significantly more commonly observed in children with constipation than in children without constipation.

Conclusion: The prevalence rates were 22.6% for constipation, 4.4% for faecal incontinence and 10.5% for urinary incontinence in a US primary care clinic. Children with constipation had higher prevalence rates for faecal and urinary incontinence than children without constipation. Boys with constipation had higher rates of faecal incontinence than girls with constipation.


Keywords: functional constipation; acute constipation; faecal incontinence; daytime urinary incontinence; night-time urinary incontinence


Related Articles

Constipation and incontinence in childhood: two sides of the same coin?
Graham Clayden and Anne Wright
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 472-474. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A brief digest of the June issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e6. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Camilleri, R. Kerstens, A. Rykx, and L. Vandeplassche
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prucalopride for Severe Chronic Constipation
N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2344 - 2354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health