Article Text

Download PDFPDF
What distinguishes unintentional injuries from injuries due to intimate partner violence: a study in Greek ambulatory care settings
  1. E Petridou1,
  2. A Browne2,
  3. E Lichter2,
  4. X Dedoukou3,
  5. D Alexe3,
  6. N Dessypris3
  1. 1Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
  2. 2Harvard Injury Control Research Center, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
  3. 3Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Eleni Petridou, Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Athens University Medical School, 75 Mikras Asias Str, Athens 11527, Greece;
 epetrid{at}med.uoa.gr

Abstract

Objectives: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important sociocultural and public health problem. This study aims to assess sociodemographic and injury characteristics of IPV victims among adults in a traditional southern European population.

Setting: Accident and emergency departments of three sentinel hospitals in Greece participating in the Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System (EDISS).

Methods: Data on sociodemographic variables, as well as event and injury characteristics were retrieved from the EDISS database during the three year period 1996–98. Out of a total of 27 319 injured women aged 19 years or more, 312 (1.1%) were reported as IPV related and were compared with 26 466 women with unintentional injuries. Among the 35 174 men with injuries 39 (0.1%) were reported as IPV related and were compared with 34 049 men with unintentional injuries. The data were analyzed through simple cross tabulations and multiple logistic regression. Positive predicted values for selected injury characteristics were also calculated.

Results: IPV is more common in rural than in urban areas of Greece. Women are 10 times more frequently IPV victims but men are also IPV victims; younger women and older men are disproportionately affected by IPV. The relative frequency of the phenomenon increases during the late evening and night hours. Certain types of injuries, notably multiple facial injuries, and presentation of the injured person on his/her own at the emergency department or combinations of predictive characteristics are strongly indicative of IPV.

Conclusions: Injuries due to IPV are not uncommon in Greece, not withstanding the traditional structure of the society and the tendency of under-reporting. Certain injury characteristics have high positive predictive values and could be used in screening protocols aiming at the correct identification of the underlying external cause in injuries that may be caused by IPV.

  • intimate partner violence
  • risk factor
  • intentional injuries
  • sociodemographic pattern
  • CI, confidence interval
  • EDISS, Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System
  • EHLASS, European Home and Leisure Accident Surveillance System
  • IPV, intimate partner violence
  • OR, odds ratio
  • intimate partner violence
  • risk factor
  • intentional injuries
  • sociodemographic pattern
  • CI, confidence interval
  • EDISS, Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System
  • EHLASS, European Home and Leisure Accident Surveillance System
  • IPV, intimate partner violence
  • OR, odds ratio

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.