Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leaf Functional Traits Are Important for the Formation of Alpine Plant Community Composition

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on the composition and structure of living organisms communities in terms of their functional traits became very popular the last decades. The functional approach is widespread, but is still rarely applied for solving two associated questions: (1) how species from a given community differ from random samples in their mean values of functional traits (with the same number of species) of local flora; (2) how much mean values of functional traits in community species differ from community weighted means (by species abundance), or, in other words, how much higher or lower are these values in dominants compared with those of other species. The aim of this study was to answer these questions using the example of alpine communities of the northwestern Caucasus. We studied leaf functional traits in four types of alpine communities, which cover maximum area in the alpine belt of the northwestern Caucasus: alpine lichen heaths (ALH), Festuca varia grasslands (FVG), Geranium–Hedysarum meadows (GHM) and alpine snowbeds (SB). Water saturated leaves of ALH plants had a significantly lower mass and specific leaf area (SLA) but a higher dry matter content compared with the samples of species from “random” communities. The dominants of this community had smaller leaves with a higher dry matter content and a lower SLA. Leaves of FVG plants had a lower area and wet mass, but a higher dry mass, while dominants had a higher leaf dry mass and dry matter content, but a lower leaf area and SLA. For the plants from more productive GHM, larger leaves and higher dry matter content are typical compared with “random” species samples. Only three size traits (leaf area, wet mass, and dry mass) were significantly higher in the dominants of GHM in comparison with other species of this community. Plants of alpine snowbeds, which grow under late snowmelt time and short growth season, had smaller leaves with high dry matter content and SLA. The dominants of these communities, in contrast, have larger leaves compared with other species of SB. The results we obtained confirm the delimiting role of stress tolerance for establishment of communities in habitats with low snow cover and for dominance there (ALH and FVG), the significant role in competitive strategy of more large-leaved species in more productive GHM and comparatively high role of ruderality in formation of SB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aiello-Lammens, M.E., Slingsby, J.A., Merow, C., Mollmann, H.K., Euston-Brown, D., et al., Processes of community assembly in an environmentally heterogeneous, high biodiversity region, Ecography, 2017, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjorkman, A.D., Myers-Smith, I.H., Elmendorf, S.C., Normand, S., Thomas, H.J.D., et al., Tundra trait team: a database of plant traits spanning the tundra biome, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2018, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1402–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgy, B., Violle, C., Choler, P., Garnier, E., Kattge, J., et al., Sensitivity of community-level trait-environment relationships to data representativeness, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2017, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butterfield, B.J. and Suding, K.N., Single-trait functional indices outperform multi-trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape, J. Ecol., 2013, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cadotte, M.W., Functional traits explain ecosystem function through opposing mechanisms, Ecol. Lett., 2017, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 989–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chagnon, P.-L., Bradley, R.L., and Klironomos, J.N., Trait-based partner selection drives mycorrhizal network assembly, Oikos, 2015, vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 1609–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornelissen, J.H.C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Diaz, S., Buchmann, N., et al., A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurements of plant functional traits worldwide, Aust. J. Bot., 2003, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 335–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cornwell, W.K. and Ackerly, D.D., Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California, Ecol. Monogr., 2009, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Denelle, P., Violle, C., and Munoz, F., Distinguishing the signatures of local environmental filtering and regional trait range limits in the study of trait-environment relationships, Oikos, 2019, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 960–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Douma, J.C., Aerts, R., Witte, J.P.M., Bekker, R.M., Kunzmann, D., et al., A combination of functionally different plant traits provides a means to quantitatively predict a broad range of species assemblages in NW Europe, Ecography, 2012, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudova, K.V., Ataballyev, G.G., Akhmetzhanova, A.A., Gulov, D.M., Dudov, S.V., et al., Plant height as a functional trait of alpine plants, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 2019, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elumeeva, T.G., Onipchenko, V.G., Rovnaia, E.N., Wu, Y., and Werger, M.J.A., Alpine plant communities of Tibet and Caucasus: In quest of functional convergence, Botanica Pacifica, 2015, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Finegan, B., Peña-Claros, M., De Oliveira, A., Ascarrunz, N., Bret-Harte, M.S., et al., Does functional trait diversity predict aboveground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses, J. Ecol., 2015, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, R.A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford: Clarendon, 1930, 1st ed.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Franzen, M., Dieker, P., Schrader, J., and Helm, A., Rapid plant colonization of the forelands of a vanishing glacier is strongly associated with species traits, Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 2019, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garnier, E., Navas, M.L., and Grigulis, K., Plant Functional Diversity, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garnier E., Cortez J., Billes G., Navas M.-L., Roumet C., et al., Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession, Ecology., 2004, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 2630–2637.

  18. Grime, J.P., Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter, and founder effects, J. Ecol., 1998, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 902–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grime, J.P., Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2001, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gross N., Robson T.M., Lavorel S., Albert C., Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y., Guillemin R., Plant response traits mediate the effects of subalpine grasslands on soil moisture, New Phytol., 2008, vol. 180, pp. 652–662.

  21. Hulshof, C.M., Violle, C., Spasojevic, M.J., McGill, B., Damschen, E., et al., Intra-specific and inter-specific variation in specific leaf area reveal the importance of abiotic and biotic drivers of species diversity across elevation and latitude, J. Veg. Sci., 2013, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, Y., Zang, R., Lu, X., Huang, Y., Ding, Y., et al., Effects of soil and microclimatic conditions on the community-level plant functional traits across different tropical forest types, Plant Soil, 2015, vol. 390, nos. 1–2, pp. 351–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kichenin, E., Wardle, D.A., Peltzer, D.A., Morse, C.W., and Freschet, G.T., Contrasting effects of plant inter- and intraspecific variation on community-level trait measures along an environmental gradients, Funct. Ecol., 2013, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1254–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Komac, B., Pladevall, C., Penuelas, J., Conesa, J.V., and Domenech, M., Variations in functional diversity in snowbed plant communities determining snowbed continuity, Plant Ecol., 2015, vol. 216, no. 9, pp. 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kunstler, G., Falster, D., Coomes, D.A., Hui, F., Kooyman, R.M., et al., Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition, Nature, 2016, vol. 529, no. 7585, pp. 204–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ladouceur, E., Bonomi, C., Bruelheide, H., Klimesova, J., Burrascano, S., et al., The functional trait spectrum of European temperate grasslands, J. Veg. Sci., 2019, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 777–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laliberté, E., Legendre, P., and Shipley, B., FD: Measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology, R package version 1.0-12, 2014. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FD/index.html.

  28. Laughlin, D.C., Gremer, J.R., Adler, P.B., Mitchell, R.M., and Moore, M.M., The net effect of functional traits on fitness, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2020, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1037–1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Garnier, E., Harrison, S.P., et al., Plant functional types: Are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail?, in Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Luo, S., Schmid, B., Wagg, C., Chen, Y., Jiang, B., et al., Community-wide trait means and variations affect biomass in a biodiversity experiment with tree seedlings, Oikos, 2020, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 799–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Majekova, M., Bello, F., Dolezal, J., and Leps, J., Plant functional traits as determinants of population stability, Ecology, 2014, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 2369–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Messier, J., McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., and Lechowicz, M.J., Trait variation and integration across scales: Is the leaf economic spectrum present at local scales?, Ecography, 2017, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirkin, B.M. and Naumova, L.G., Nauka o rastitel’nosti (Vegetation Science), Ufa: Gilem, 1998.

  34. Onipchenko, V.G., Structure, phytomass and productivity of Alpine lichen barrens, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1985, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Onipchenko, V.G., Phytomass of Alpine communities of the Northwestern Caucasus, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1990, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Onipchenko, V.G., The structure and dynamics of alpine plant communities in the Teberda Reserve, the Northwestern Caucasus, Oecologia Montana, 1994, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Onipchenko, V.G., Alpine Vegetation of the Teberda Reserve, the Northwestern Caucasus, Zurich: Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Onipchenko, V.G. and Semenova, G.V., Comparative analysis of the floristic richness of alpine communities in the Caucasus and the Central Alps, J. Veg. Sci., 1995, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Onipchenko, V.G., Semenova, G.V., and Van der Maarel, E., Population strategies in severe environments: Alpine plants in the Northwestern Caucasus, J. Veg. Sci., 1998, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Onipchenko, V.G., Blinnikov, M.S., Gerasimova, M.A., Volkova, E.V., and Cornelissen, J.H.C., Experimental comparison of competition and facilitation in alpine communities varying in productivity, J. Veg. Sci., 2009, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 718–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Onipchenko, V.G., Zernov, A.S., and Vorob’eva, F.M., Sosudistye rasteniya Teberdinskogo zapovednika (Vascular Plants of the Teberdinsky Reserve), Moscow: MaksPress, 2011.

  42. Onipchenko, V.G., Rozhin, A.O., Smirnov, V.E., Akhmetzhanova, A.A., Elumeeva, T.G., et al., Do patterns of intra-specific variability and community weighted-means of leaf traits correspond? An example from Alpine plants, Botanica Pacifica, 2020, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Onipchenko, V.G., Dudova, K.V., Akhmetzhanova, A.A., et al., Which plant strategies are related to dominance in Alpine communities?, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Diaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., et al., New handbook for standardized measurement of plant functional traits worldwide, Aust. J. Bot., 2013, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 167–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Petchey O.L., Gaston K.J., Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward, Ecol. Lett., 2006, vol. 9, pp. 741–758.

  46. Pfestorf, H., Weiss, L., Müller, J., Boch, S., Socher, S.A., et al., Community mean traits as additional indicators to monitor effects of land-use intensity on grassland plant diversity Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2013, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pierce, S., Brusa, G., Vagge, I., and Cerabolini, B.E.L., Allocating CSR plant functional types: The use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants, Funct. Ecol., 2013, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1002–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pierce, S., Negreiros, D., Cerabolini, B.E.L., Kattge, J., Diaz, S., et al., A global method for calculating plant csr ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide, Funct. Ecol., 2017, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Price, J.N., Gazol, A., Tamme, R., Hiiesalu, I., and Partel, M., The functional assembly of experimental grasslands in relation to fertility and resource heterogeneity, Funct. Ecol., 2014, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Price, J., Tamme, R., Gazol, A., Bello, F., Takkis, K., et al., Within-community environmental variability drives trait variability in species-rich grasslands, J. Veg. Sci., 2017, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Quetier F., Thebault A., Lavorel S., Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change, Ecol. Monogr., 2007, vol. 77, pp. 33–52.

  52. R Core Team, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020. https://www.R-project.org/.

  53. Rabotnov, T.A., On the types of plant strategy, Ekologiya, 1985, no. 3, pp. 3–12.

  54. Ramenskii L.G., On the fundamental principles, basic concepts and terms of the production typology of lands, geobotany and ecology, Sov. Bot., 1935, no. 4, pp. 25–40.

  55. Rosado, B.H.P. and De Mattos, E.A., On the relative importance of CSR ecological strategies and integrative traits to explain species dominance at local scales, Funct. Ecol., 2017, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1969–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Scherer-Lorenzen M., Functional diversity affects decomposition processes in experimental grasslands, Funct. Ecol., 2008, vol. 22, pp. 547–555.

  57. Shipley, B., Belluau, M., Kühn, I., Soudzilovskaia, N.A., Bahn, M., et al., Predicting habitat affinities of plant species using commonly measured functional traits, J. Veg. Sci., 2017, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1082–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Swenson, N.G., Phylogenetic imputation of plant functional trait databases, Ecography, 2014, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Thomas, H.J.D., Myers-Smith, I.H., Bjorkman, A.D., Elmendorf, S.C., Blok, D., et al., Traditional plant functional groups explain variation in economic but not size-related traits across the tundra biome, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2019, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 78–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tilman D., Functional diversity, Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Ed. Levin S.A. San Diego: Academic Press. 2001, vol. 3, pp. 109–120.

  61. Verheijen, L.M., Aerts, R., Bönisch, G., Kattge, J., and Van Bodegom, P.M., Variation in trait trade-offs allows differentiation among predefined plant functional types: Implications for predictive ecology, New Phytol., 2016, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 563–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wagg, C., Ebeling, A., Roscher, C., Ravenek, J., Bachmann, D., et al., Functional trait dissimilarity drives both species complementarity and competitive disparity, Funct. Ecol., 2017, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2320–2329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Westoby, M., A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme, Plant Soil, 1998, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 213–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Westoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A., and Wright, I.J., Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 2002, vol. 33, pp. 125–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wickham, H., The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis, Journal of Statistical Software, 2011, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wickham, H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, New York: Springer, 2016.

  67. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., and Müller, K., dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.0.7., 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-04-00544.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    V. G. Onipchenko, K. V. Dudova, A. A. Akhmetzhanova & T. G. Elumeeva

  2. Teberda National Park, 369210, Teberda, Karachaevo-Cherkessian Republic, Russia

    V. G. Onipchenko & D. K. Tekeev

  3. Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia

    D. M. Gulov

Authors
  1. V. G. Onipchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. V. Dudova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. M. Gulov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. A. Akhmetzhanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. K. Tekeev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. G. Elumeeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. G. Onipchenko.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This article does not contain the results of any research using animals as subjects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onipchenko, V.G., Dudova, K.V., Gulov, D.M. et al. Leaf Functional Traits Are Important for the Formation of Alpine Plant Community Composition. Biol Bull Rev 13, 228–237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086423030064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086423030064

Search

Navigation